Literature DB >> 1481708

Gender bias in the evaluation and management of acute nontraumatic chest pain. The St. Louis Emergency Physicians' Association Research Group.

T F Heston1, L M Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest a gender-based difference in the management of myocardial ischemia in nonacute settings. We examined whether there was a gender difference in the emergency department evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain.
METHODS: A record review from 10 St. Louis metropolitan emergency departments was done on all patients over 35 years old who presented with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain. We reviewed for the presence of cardiac risk factors, prior cardiac disease, time to physician evaluation, and time to initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup admitted from the emergency department with a diagnosis of myocardial infarction or unstable angina, disposition was noted.
RESULTS: Women waited longer than men for an initial physician evaluation and an initial electrocardiogram. In the patient subgroup with acute myocardial ischemia, a smaller percentage of women than men (56.0% vs 82.8%) were admitted to an intensive care unit.
CONCLUSION: In patients with acute nonpleuritic, nontraumatic chest pain, women were evaluated and managed less aggressively than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1481708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract Res J        ISSN: 0270-2304


  7 in total

Review 1.  Differences in clinical communication by gender.

Authors:  V Elderkin-Thompson; H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  A two way view of gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  M T Ruiz; L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Neuropsychological approaches for the detection and evaluation of toxic symptoms.

Authors:  N Fiedler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Elena Ronda; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Gender differences in health care use among the elderly population in areas of Norway and Finland. A cross-sectional analysis based on the HUNT study and the FINRISK Senior Survey.

Authors:  Anna Liisa Suominen-Taipale; Tuija Martelin; Seppo Koskinen; Jostein Holmen; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Social inequalities in blindness and visual impairment: a review of social determinants.

Authors:  Anna Rius Ulldemolins; Van C Lansingh; Laura Guisasola Valencia; Marissa J Carter; Kristen A Eckert
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.