Literature DB >> 1480800

Estimating dermal uptake of nonionic organic chemicals from water and soil: I. Unified fugacity-based models for risk assessments.

T E McKone1, R A Howd.   

Abstract

Contamination of water and soil that might eventually contact human skin makes it imperative to include the dermal uptake route in efforts to assess potential environmental health risks. Direct measurements of dermal uptake from either water or soil are only available for a small number of the thousands of chemicals likely to be found in the environment. We propose here a mass-transfer model for estimating skin permeability and dermal uptake for organic chemicals that contaminate soil and water. Statistical relationships between measured permeabilities and chemical properties reveal that permeability varies primarily with the octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and secondarily with the molecular weight. From these results, we derive a fugacity-based model for skin permeability that addresses the inherent permeability of the skin, the interaction of the skin with the environmental medium on skin (water or soil), and retains a relatively simple algebraic form. Model predictions are compared to measured human skin permeabilities for some 50 compounds in water and four compounds in soil. The model is adjusted to account for dermal uptake during both short-term (10-20 min) and long-term (several hour) exposures. This model is recommended for compounds with molecular weight less than or equal to 280 g.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1480800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00711.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

1.  Conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure.

Authors:  T Schneider; R Vermeulen; D H Brouwer; J W Cherrie; H Kromhout; C L Fogh
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Quantitative structure-permeation relationships (QSPeRs) to predict skin permeation: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Sandrine Geinoz; Richard H Guy; Bernard Testa; Pierre-Alain Carrupt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Fusing probability density function into Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence for the evaluation of water treatment plant.

Authors:  Shakhawat Chowdhury
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluation of Exposure to Brevundimonas diminuta and Pseudomonas aeruginosa during Showering.

Authors:  Sandip Chattopadhyay; Sarah D Perkins; Matthew Shaw; Tonya L Nichols
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.433

5.  Desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from field-contaminated soil to a two-dimensional hydrophobic surface before and after bioremediation.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Michael D Aitken
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Estimation of maximum transdermal flux of nonionized xenobiotics from basic physicochemical determinants.

Authors:  Mikolaj Milewski; Audra L Stinchcomb
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Predicting human exposure and risk from chlorinated indoor swimming pool: a case study.

Authors:  Shakhawat Chowdhury
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.513

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.