Literature DB >> 1480446

Facemasks versus mouthpieces for aerosol treatment of asthmatic children.

D Lowenthal1, M Kattan.   

Abstract

Mouthpieces and facemasks are being used with nebulizers for delivery of medication in acute asthma. To compare the effectivity of the two devices, 64 children age 6 to 19 years presenting to the hospital with acute asthma were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind study. Group 1 used a facemask. Group 2 used a mouthpiece connected to the nebulizer via short T-shaped tubing. Clinical evaluation and spirometry were performed at baseline and 20, 40, and 60 minutes after a single treatment with albuterol. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced expiratory flow over the middle 50% of FVC (FEF25-75) were determined at each point. Adverse effects were recorded. There was no significant difference in improvement between the groups. Patients with nasal congestion, age below 10 years, or severe airway obstruction did equally well with each method. Patients in the facemask group had a higher incidence of tremor. We conclude that the mouthpiece is an effective as the facemask and produces less tremor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1480446     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950140309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  3 in total

Review 1.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Treatment of childhood asthma. Options and rationale for inhaled therapy.

Authors:  C V Powell; M L Everard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Use of inhaler devices in pediatric asthma.

Authors:  Fernando Maria De Benedictis; David Selvaggio
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.