Literature DB >> 147970

Comparison of methods for the dynamic calibration of electromagnetic flowmeters.

F D Cave, J Franklin, P L Patel.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 147970     DOI: 10.1007/bf02442932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  A simple method for measuring the frequency response of an electromagnetic flowmeter.

Authors:  M H Calvert; B R Pullan; D E Bone
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1975-07

2.  FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOWMETERS.

Authors:  U GESSNER; D H BERGEL
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  DYNAMIC ACCURACY OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FLOWMETER.

Authors:  M F O'ROURKE
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Frequencies in pulsatile flow and reponse of magnetic meter.

Authors:  D J FERGUSON; H S WELLS
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Frequency response of three commercial electromagnetic flowmeters.

Authors:  C M Philips; J C Davila
Journal:  Am J Med Electron       Date:  1965 Oct-Dec

6.  Electronic dynamic calibration of electromagnetic flowmeters.

Authors:  A H Goodman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.531

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Blood flow and blood velocity measurement in vivo by electromagnetic induction.

Authors:  D G Wyatt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.