Literature DB >> 1479529

Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.

M S Reddy1.   

Abstract

Radiographic methods are commonly utilized to assess periodontal bone changes in clinical trials. Radiographs are unique as a data source in that they provide a permanent visual record of the bone support and allow for linear, area, and volume measurements of periodontal lesions. The major limiting factors in the use of radiographic outcomes measures are geometric distortion and radiographic processing errors. The use of standardized methods and computer algorithms has reduced the effect of these errors on data from radiographs. Radiographic analysis in clinical trials is largely done in digital format by indirect digitizing film with a video camera. Direct digital detectors are now available for intra-oral use. The use of a direct detector eliminates the need for film processing and allows for dose reduction. The detectors currently available are limited in size and resolution. Subtraction radiography allows for area and volume estimates of bone gain or loss. The subtraction methods are highly precise, but are also technically exacting and labor intensive. The clinical trial hypothesis, size, length, and accuracy required should be the final consideration in choosing a radiographic method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1479529     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.12s.1078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  18 in total

1.  Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  A retrospective study of digital subtraction technique to detect sclerotic changes in alveolar bone on intraoral radiographs of bisphosphonate-treated patients.

Authors:  M U Zaman; T Nakamoto; K Tanimoto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of simulated periodontal defects via various radiographic methods.

Authors:  Ayse Zeynep Zengin; Pinar Sumer; Peruze Celenk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of periodontal evaluation by cone-beam computed tomography, and clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations.

Authors:  Wenjian Zhang; Shazia Rajani; Bing-Yan Wang
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia Fernanda Haas; Glaucia Santos Zimmermann; G De Luca Canto; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Corrêa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography.

Authors:  K de Faria Vasconcelos; K M Evangelista; C D Rodrigues; C Estrela; T O de Sousa; M A G Silva
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Evaluation of calcium sulphate barrier to collagen membrane in intrabony defects.

Authors:  Shilpa Budhiraja; Neeta Bhavsar; Santosh Kumar; Khushboo Desai; Sareen Duseja
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Murat Icen; Kaan Orhan; Çiğdem Şeker; Gediz Geduk; Fethiye Cakmak Özlü; Murat İnanç Cengiz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest.

Authors:  Germana Jayme Borges; Luis Fernando Naldi Ruiz; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; Olavo César Lyra Porto; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month study - radiographic results.

Authors:  Daniela Eleutério Diniz; Kalizia Marcela Okuda; Clarissa Ribeiro Fonseca; Marly Kimie Sonohara Gonzalez; Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi; Accácio Lins do Valle; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.