BACKGROUND: Flickering light stimulation of the retina is known to increase retinal vessel diameter in animals and humans. The aim of the study was to quantify the response of retinal vessel diameter to red-green and blue-green flickering light. METHODS: In 11 normal healthy volunteers (mean age: 25.2+/-6.8 years) retinal arterial and venous diameters were examined by Retinal Vessel Analyzer (IMEDOS Ltd., Weimar, Germany) before, during and after red-green and blue-green flicker stimulation with a frequency of 12 Hz and duration of 10 and 30 s. RESULTS: For red-green flicker at 10 s there was a 2.4+/-1.4% arterial diameter increase at 9.1+/-3.3 s with a return to baseline after 30 s and a 2.4+/-1.1% venous diameter increase at 12.1+/-2.6 s with a return to baseline after 30 s. For red-green flicker at 30 s there was a 3.2+/-1.5% arterial diameter increase at 26.9+/-12.6 s with a return to baseline after 40 s and a 4.9+/-1.8% venous diameter increase at 31.4+/-7.6 s with a return to baseline after 40 s. For blue-green flicker at 10 s there was a 2.0+/-0.7% arterial diameter increase at 10.6+/-5.3 s with a return to baseline after 30 s and a 2.3+/-1.1% venous diameter increase at 12.0+/-5.5 s with a return to baseline after 30 s. For blue-green flicker at 30 s there was a 2.6+/-1.3% arterial diameter increase at 20.7+/-8.0 s with a return to baseline after 40 s and a 3.4+/-2.2% venous diameter increase at 28.8+/-10.5 s with a return to baseline after 40 s. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal vessel diameter dilation is a reproducible response to the applied flicker stimuli. This finding supports the existence of neurovascular coupling in the human retina. Flicker stimulation in either red-green or blue-green might be a useful stimulus for examination of retinal vessel behavior to regulatory demands.
BACKGROUND: Flickering light stimulation of the retina is known to increase retinal vessel diameter in animals and humans. The aim of the study was to quantify the response of retinal vessel diameter to red-green and blue-green flickering light. METHODS: In 11 normal healthy volunteers (mean age: 25.2+/-6.8 years) retinal arterial and venous diameters were examined by Retinal Vessel Analyzer (IMEDOS Ltd., Weimar, Germany) before, during and after red-green and blue-green flicker stimulation with a frequency of 12 Hz and duration of 10 and 30 s. RESULTS: For red-green flicker at 10 s there was a 2.4+/-1.4% arterial diameter increase at 9.1+/-3.3 s with a return to baseline after 30 s and a 2.4+/-1.1% venous diameter increase at 12.1+/-2.6 s with a return to baseline after 30 s. For red-green flicker at 30 s there was a 3.2+/-1.5% arterial diameter increase at 26.9+/-12.6 s with a return to baseline after 40 s and a 4.9+/-1.8% venous diameter increase at 31.4+/-7.6 s with a return to baseline after 40 s. For blue-green flicker at 10 s there was a 2.0+/-0.7% arterial diameter increase at 10.6+/-5.3 s with a return to baseline after 30 s and a 2.3+/-1.1% venous diameter increase at 12.0+/-5.5 s with a return to baseline after 30 s. For blue-green flicker at 30 s there was a 2.6+/-1.3% arterial diameter increase at 20.7+/-8.0 s with a return to baseline after 40 s and a 3.4+/-2.2% venous diameter increase at 28.8+/-10.5 s with a return to baseline after 40 s. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal vessel diameter dilation is a reproducible response to the applied flicker stimuli. This finding supports the existence of neurovascular coupling in the human retina. Flicker stimulation in either red-green or blue-green might be a useful stimulus for examination of retinal vessel behavior to regulatory demands.
Authors: Catharina Conzen; Walid Albanna; Miriam Weiss; David Kürten; Walthard Vilser; Konstantin Kotliar; Charlotte Zäske; Hans Clusmann; Gerrit Alexander Schubert Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Walid Albanna; Catharina Conzen; Miriam Weiss; Hans Clusmann; Matthias Fuest; Marguerite Mueller; Marc Alexander Brockmann; Walthard Vilser; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Anke Hoellig; Marcel Seiz; Claudius Thomé; Konstantin Kotliar; Gerrit Alexander Schubert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240