Literature DB >> 14769367

Assessment of axonal loss in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies.

Victoria H Lawson1, A Gordon Smith, Mark B Bromberg.   

Abstract

Sensory loss and weakness in Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathy is due to axonal loss. However, the pattern and degree of axonal loss cannot be accurately determined from routine electrodiagnostic or strength testing due to collateral reinnervation. We sought to quantify axonal loss in two upper extremity muscles in CMT1A and CMT2 subjects using the electrophysiologic endpoint measure of motor unit number estimation (MUNE). Hypothenar and biceps-brachialis muscle groups were studied in 9 CMT1A, 9 CMT2, and 10 control subjects. The spike-triggered averaging (STA) technique was used to collect surface motor unit potentials for MUNE calculations, and a needle electrode was used to collect corresponding intramuscular data. Maximal voluntary hypothenar and handgrip strength was measured quantitatively, while biceps-brachialis strength was measured qualitatively. Compared to normal subjects, CMT1A and CMT2 subjects had significantly lower MUNE values in hypothenar muscles. Biceps-brachialis MUNE values were reduced in CMT2 but not in CMT1A subjects. In support of proximal axonal loss in CMT2 subjects, surface motor unit and intramuscular potential amplitudes were higher in biceps-brachialis muscles compared to controls. Correlations between quantitative strength and MUNE were significant for hypothenar but not for grip muscle groups. Axonal loss is demonstrated in distal muscles in CMT1A and CMT2 supporting a length-dependent axonopathy. Despite clinical findings of normal or near-normal strength and small reductions in compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, MUNE values were significantly lower in CMT2 subjects in proximal muscles, consistent with more diffuse denervation. These data indicate that subclinical axonal loss is present that cannot be appreciated using clinical examination or routine electrodiagnostic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14769367     DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00293-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of CMT1A and CMT2: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Henriette M E Bienfait; Camiel Verhamme; Ivo N van Schaik; Johannes H T M Koelman; Bram W Ongerboer de Visser; Rob J de Haan; Frank Baas; Baziel G M van Engelen; Marianne de Visser
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Intermediate Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: an electrophysiological reappraisal and systematic review.

Authors:  José Berciano; Antonio García; Elena Gallardo; Kristien Peeters; Ana L Pelayo-Negro; Silvia Álvarez-Paradelo; José Gazulla; Miriam Martínez-Tames; Jon Infante; Albena Jordanova
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Motor unit number estimation in the rat tail using a modified multipoint stimulation technique.

Authors:  Lora J Kasselman; Jeremy M Shefner; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 4.  New evidence for secondary axonal degeneration in demyelinating neuropathies.

Authors:  Kathryn R Moss; Taylor S Bopp; Anna E Johnson; Ahmet Höke
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: improving long-term care with a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Donald McCorquodale; Evan M Pucillo; Nicholas E Johnson
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-01-19

6.  Association between Early Neuroretinal Dysfunction and Peripheral Motor Unit Loss in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Fabiana Picconi; Giorgia Mataluni; Lucia Ziccardi; Mariacristina Parravano; Antonio Di Renzo; Dorina Ylli; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Valeria Studer; Laura Chioma; Girolama Alessandra Marfia; Simona Frontoni
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.011

7.  Volumetric MRI is a promising outcome measure of muscle reinnervation.

Authors:  Matthew Wilcox; Liane Dos Santos Canas; Rikin Hargunani; Tom Tidswell; Hazel Brown; Marc Modat; James B Phillips; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Quick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Neuroregenerative Effect of Oxandrolone: A Case Report.

Authors:  Vittorio Bianchi; Adriana Marbini
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.