Literature DB >> 14769299

Development of a valid, cost-effective laparoscopic training program.

G L Adrales1, U B Chu, J D Hoskins, D B Witzke, A E Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practical programs for training and evaluating surgeons in laparoscopy are needed to keep pace with demand for minimally invasive surgery.
METHODS: At the University of Kentucky five inexpensive simulations have been developed to train and assess surgical residents. Residents are videotaped performing laparoscopic procedures on models. Five surgeons assess the taped performances on 4 global skills.
RESULTS: Creating mechanical models reduces training costs. Trainees agreed procedures were well represented by the simulations. Blinded assessment of performances showed high interrater agreement and correlated with the trainees' level of experience. Nonclinician evaluations on checklists correlated with evaluations by surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Inexpensive simulations of laparoscopic appendectomy, cholecystectomy, inguinal herniorrhaphy, bowel enterotomy, and splenectomy enable surgical residents to practice laparoscopic skills safely. Obtaining masked, objective, and independent evaluations of basic skills in laparoscopic surgery can assist in reliable assessment of surgical trainees. The simulations described can anchor an innovative educational program during residency for training and assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14769299     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: a long road.

Authors:  N J Hogle; L Chang; V E M Strong; A O U Welcome; M Sinaan; R Bailey; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position.

Authors:  Yassar Youssef; Gyusung Lee; Carlos Godinez; Erica Sutton; Rosemary V Klein; Ivan M George; F Jacob Seagull; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Analysis of a structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Khoon Hean Tay; Swee Ho Lim; T Ravintharan; Ngian Chye Tan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Beyer-Berjot; Vanessa Palter; Teodor Grantcharov; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  A cross-sectional pilot study to investigate patient attitudes and perception regarding the use of real time digital recording of urological procedures for research and teaching purposes.

Authors:  Gary Sharp; Giorgio Mazzon; Ranjan Thilagarajah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-14

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by residents and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Francesco Martini; Michele Rossi; Cinzia Tommasi; Egidio Miranda; Luis Josè Sanchez; Riccardo Naspetti; Roberto Manetti; Angelo Ferrara; Silvia Nesi; Bernardo Boffi; Marco Farsi; Renato Moretti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  A systematic review of low-cost laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  Mimi M Li; Joseph George
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.