Literature DB >> 14769128

Raters who pursue different goals give different ratings.

Kevin R Murphy1, Jeanette N Cleveland, Amie L Skattebo, Ted B Kinney.   

Abstract

J. N. Cleveland and K. R. Murphy (1992) suggested that phenomena such as rater errors and interrater disagreements could be understood in terms of differences in the goals pursued by various raters. We measured 19 rating goals of students at the beginning of a semester, grouped them into scales, and correlated these with teacher evaluations collected at the end of the semester. We found significant multiple correlations, both within classes and in an analysis of the pooled sample (adjusting for instructor mean differences, incremental R2 =.08). Measures of rating goals obtained after raters had observed a significant proportion of ratee performance accounted for variance (incremental R2 =.07) not accounted for by measures of goals obtained at the beginning of the semester. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14769128     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  5 in total

1.  Investigating the relationship between pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations and preferred teacher qualities.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Taking Rater Exposure to Trainees Into Account When Explaining Rater Variability.

Authors:  Christy K Boscardin; Marjo Wijnen-Meijer; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-12

4.  Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructs.

Authors:  M J B Govaerts; M W J Van de Wiel; L W T Schuwirth; C P M Van der Vleuten; A M M Muijtjens
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.853

5.  Leniency Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates.

Authors:  Kevin H C Cheng; C Harry Hui; Wayne F Cascio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.