L W Niessen1, R Dijkstra, R Hutubessy, G E H M Rutten, A F Casparie. 1. Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University of Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands. niessen@bmg.eur.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article presents cost-effectiveness analyses of the major diabetes interventions as formulated in the revised Dutch guidelines for diabetes type 2 patients in primary and secondary care. The analyses consider two types of care: diabetes control and the treatment of complications, each at current care level and according to the guidelines. METHODS: A validated probabilistic diabetes model describes diabetes and its complications over a lifetime in the Dutch population, computing quality-adjusted life years and medical costs. Effectiveness data and costs of diabetes interventions are from observational current care studies and intensive care experiments. Lifetime consequences of in total sixteen intervention mixes are compared with a baseline glycaemic control of 10% HBA1C. RESULTS: The interventions may reduce the cumulative incidence of blindness, lower-extremity amputation, and end-stage renal disease by >70% in primary care and >60% in secondary care. All primary care guidelines together add 0.8 quality-adjusted life years per lifetime. CONCLUSION: In case of few resources, treating complications according to guidelines yields the most health benefits. Current care of diabetes complications is inefficient. If there are sufficient resources, countries may implement all guidelines, also on diabetes control, and improve efficiency in diabetes care.
BACKGROUND: This article presents cost-effectiveness analyses of the major diabetes interventions as formulated in the revised Dutch guidelines for diabetes type 2patients in primary and secondary care. The analyses consider two types of care: diabetes control and the treatment of complications, each at current care level and according to the guidelines. METHODS: A validated probabilistic diabetes model describes diabetes and its complications over a lifetime in the Dutch population, computing quality-adjusted life years and medical costs. Effectiveness data and costs of diabetes interventions are from observational current care studies and intensive care experiments. Lifetime consequences of in total sixteen intervention mixes are compared with a baseline glycaemic control of 10% HBA1C. RESULTS: The interventions may reduce the cumulative incidence of blindness, lower-extremity amputation, and end-stage renal disease by >70% in primary care and >60% in secondary care. All primary care guidelines together add 0.8 quality-adjusted life years per lifetime. CONCLUSION: In case of few resources, treating complications according to guidelines yields the most health benefits. Current care of diabetes complications is inefficient. If there are sufficient resources, countries may implement all guidelines, also on diabetes control, and improve efficiency in diabetes care.
Authors: Heleen G M van Haalen; Marjolein Pompen; Klas Bergenheim; Phil McEwan; Rebecca Townsend; Marina Roudaut Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Talitha L Feenstra; Pieter M van Baal; Monique O Jacobs-van der Bruggen; Rudolf T Hoogenveen; Geert-Jan Kommer; Caroline A Baan Journal: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Date: 2011-10-06
Authors: Rimke C Vos; Nathalie W D Eikelenboom; Maarten Klomp; Rebecca K Stellato; Guy E H M Rutten Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Alexander V van Schoonhoven; Judith J Gout-Zwart; Marijke J S de Vries; Antoinette D I van Asselt; Evgeni Dvortsin; Pepijn Vemer; Job F M van Boven; Maarten J Postma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frits G W Cleveringa; Paco M J Welsing; Maureen van den Donk; Kees J Gorter; Louis W Niessen; Guy E H M Rutten; William K Redekop Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Renate Jansink; Jozé Braspenning; Trudy van der Weijden; Louis Niessen; Glyn Elwyn; Richard Grol Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 2.655