Literature DB >> 14767534

Evidence that long-term COX-treatment improves energy homeostasis and body composition in cancer patients with progressive cachexia.

Kent Lundholm1, Peter Daneryd, Ulla Körner, Anders Hyltander, Ingvar Bosaeus.   

Abstract

Cancer patients lose weight due to negative energy balance because of insufficient appetite and inappropriately high energy expenditure. Host and tumor derived cytokines and more recently eicosanoids have been held responsible as mediators. Accordingly, observations in animal experiments and short-term clinical trials in selected groups of cancer patients, have implied that cyclo-oxygenase (COX) blockade can improve host metabolism and well-being, and long-term COX-treatment of unselected groups have implied improved survival. The aim of this study was to search for evidence that long-term COX-treatment improves energy and cardiovascular homeostasis in unselected weight-losing cancer patients. A retrospective case control analysis was performed on a data-base material collected consecutively. Weight-losing untreated cancer patients had elevated resting energy expenditure compared to undernourished non-cancer patients (23.3+/-0.1, n=702 vs 20.9+/-0.3 kcal/kg/day, n=132, p<0.001). This difference became significantly reduced by long-term indomethacin treatment (p<0.003). Heart rate was correspondingly decreased, while systolic blood pressure increased following indomethacin treatment of cancer patients (p<0.006-0.008). Total body fat was more preserved (p<0.005), while lean body mass was uninfluenced by long-term indomethacin to cancer patients. All these beneficial effects were parallel to a decrease in systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) in cancer patients on indomethacin (p<0.0004). Systemic inflammation and resting energy metabolism predicted weight loss in progressive cancer (p<0.0001). Our data support the concept that COX-treatment may offer beneficial metabolic effects to weight-losing cancer patients by attenuation of resting metabolism and improved appetite due to decreased systemic inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oncol        ISSN: 1019-6439            Impact factor:   5.650


  21 in total

Review 1.  Key determinants of energy expenditure in cancer and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  S A Purcell; S A Elliott; V E Baracos; Q S C Chu; C M Prado
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Inflammatory burden and amino acid metabolism in cancer cachexia.

Authors:  William J Durham; Edgar Lichar Dillon; Melinda Sheffield-Moore
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Diagnostic criteria of cancer cachexia: relation to quality of life, exercise capacity and survival in unselected palliative care patients.

Authors:  Ola Wallengren; Kent Lundholm; Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Kenneth Fearon; Jann Arends; Vickie Baracos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Nutritional support in multimodal therapy for cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Advances in cancer cachexia: Intersection between affected organs, mediators, and pharmacological interventions.

Authors:  Jawed A Siddiqui; Ramesh Pothuraju; Maneesh Jain; Surinder K Batra; Mohd W Nasser
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 10.680

7.  Chemoprevention with phosphatidylcholine non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Lenard M Lichtenberger; Tri Phan; Dexing Fang; Elizabeth J Dial
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Loss of muscle mass in the end of life in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Ola Wallengren; Britt-Marie Iresjö; Kent Lundholm; Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Phase II nonrandomized study of the efficacy and safety of COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib on patients with cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Giovanni Mantovani; Antonio Macciò; Clelia Madeddu; Roberto Serpe; Giorgia Antoni; Elena Massa; Mariele Dessì; Filomena Panzone
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Global tumor RNA expression in early establishment of experimental tumor growth and related angiogenesis following COX-inhibition evaluated by microarray analysis.

Authors:  Hans Axelsson; Christina Lönnroth; Marianne Andersson; Wenhua Wang; Kent Lundholm
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.