Literature DB >> 14767480

Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division.

Michael A Lampson1, Kishore Renduchitala, Alexey Khodjakov, Tarun M Kapoor.   

Abstract

For accurate segregation of chromosomes during cell division, microtubule fibres must attach sister kinetochores to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle (bi-orientation). Aurora kinases are linked to oncogenesis and have been implicated in the regulation of chromosome-microtubule attachments. Although loss of Aurora kinase activity causes an accumulation of mal-orientated chromosomes in dividing cells, it is not known how the active kinase corrects improper chromosome attachments. The use of reversible small-molecule inhibitors allows activation of protein function in living vertebrate cells with temporal control. Here we show that by removal of small-molecule inhibitors, controlled activation of Aurora kinase during mitosis can correct chromosome attachment errors by selective disassembly of kinetochore-microtubule fibres, rather than by alternative mechanisms involving initial release of microtubules from either kinetochores or spindle poles. Observation of chromosomes and microtubule dynamics with real-time high-resolution microscopy showed that mal-orientated, but not bi-orientated, chromosomes move to the spindle pole as both kinetochore-microtubule fibres shorten, followed by alignment at the metaphase plate. Our results provide direct evidence for a mechanism required for the maintenance of genome integrity during cell division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767480     DOI: 10.1038/ncb1102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  210 in total

1.  Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Michelle M Shimogawa; Megan M Wargacki; Eric G Muller; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Chromosome congression is promoted by CENP-Q- and CENP-E-dependent pathways.

Authors:  James Bancroft; Philip Auckland; Catarina P Samora; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Microfluidics-integrated time-lapse imaging for analysis of cellular dynamics.

Authors:  Dirk R Albrecht; Gregory H Underhill; Joshua Resnikoff; Avital Mendelson; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 4.  Chromosomal passengers: the four-dimensional regulation of mitotic events.

Authors:  Paola Vagnarelli; William C Earnshaw
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Differentiation of cytoplasmic and meiotic spindle assembly MCAK functions by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  Ryoma Ohi; Tanuj Sapra; Jonathan Howard; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Cell division and cell survival in the absence of survivin.

Authors:  Dun Yang; Alana Welm; J Michael Bishop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Mitosis in vertebrates: the G2/M and M/A transitions and their associated checkpoints.

Authors:  Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Towards a quantitative understanding of mitotic spindle assembly and mechanics.

Authors:  Alex Mogilner; Erin Craig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.