Literature DB >> 14767306

Computer aided learning versus standard lecture for undergraduate education in urology.

Daniel Seabra1, Miguel Srougi, Renato Baptista, Luciano J Nesrallah, Valdemar Ortiz, Daniel Sigulem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current model of undergraduate medical education is under debate since knowledge retention and student interest seem to be decreasing. To clarify this situation we developed and evaluated a computer aided learning program using a multimedia presentation about prostate cancer for undergraduate teaching in urology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 medical students from years 2 and 3 were divided into group 1-31 who used the multimedia program and group 2-29 who attended a standard lecture on the same subject. At the end the level of knowledge acquisition for the 2 groups was evaluated by a multiple choice test. Group 1 students also answered a questionnaire about subjective feelings on computer based teaching.
RESULTS: Test performance in groups 1 and 2 was similar (60% vs 62% correct answers, p >0.05). On the other hand, 23 of 31 students using the multimedia program believed that it did not adequately replace the instructor and interaction with a mentor still seems to be relevant.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study computers and multimedia programs can be used for undergraduate education in urology, providing that direct contact with an instructor is concomitantly offered to students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767306     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000114303.17198.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Web-based versus traditional lecture: are they equally effective as a flexible bronchoscopy teaching method?

Authors:  Caio Augusto Sterse Mata; Luiz Hirotoshi Ota; Iunis Suzuki; Adriana Telles; Andre Miotto; Luiz Eduardo Vilaça Leão
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-18

2.  A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Douglas J Gould; Mark A Terrell; Jo Fleming
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances.

Authors:  Geoff Wong; Trisha Greenhalgh; Ray Pawson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Evaluation of mobile learning: students' experiences in a new rural-based medical school.

Authors:  Debra Nestel; Andre Ng; Katherine Gray; Robyn Hill; Elmer Villanueva; George Kotsanas; Andrew Oaten; Chris Browne
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Electronic learning can facilitate student performance in undergraduate surgical education: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  David Gerard Healy; Fergal J Fleming; David Gilhooley; Patrick Felle; Alfred Edward Wood; Thomas Gorey; Enda W McDermott; John M Fitzpatrick; Niall J O'Higgins; Arnold D K Hill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Weijun Peng; Fan Zhang; Rong Hu; Yingxue Li; Weirong Yan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Seble Frehywot; Yianna Vovides; Zohray Talib; Nadia Mikhail; Heather Ross; Hannah Wohltjen; Selam Bedada; Kristine Korhumel; Abdel Karim Koumare; James Scott
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2013-02-04

8.  Comparison of a web-based package with tutor-based methods of teaching respiratory medicine: subjective and objective evaluations.

Authors:  Susan F Smith; Nicola J Roberts; Martyn R Partridge
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Game-based e-learning is more effective than a conventional instructional method: a randomized controlled trial with third-year medical students.

Authors:  Martin Boeker; Peter Andel; Werner Vach; Alexander Frankenschmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

Authors:  Kristine Rasmussen; José Marcano Belisario; Petra A Wark; Joseph Antonio Molina; Stewart Lee Loong; Ziva Cotic; Nikos Papachristou; Eva Riboli-Sasco; Lorainne Tudor Car; Eve Marie Musulanov; Holger Kunz; Yanfeng Zhang; Pradeep Paul George; Bee Hoon Heng; Erica Lynette Wheeler; Najeeb Al Shorbaji; Igor Svab; Rifat Atun; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.