Literature DB >> 14767295

Abdominal sacral colpopexy using autologous fascia lata.

Jerilyn M Latini1, Jameel A Brown, Karl J Kreder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Numerous techniques and materials have traditionally been used to correct vaginal vault prolapse, including cadaveric fascia, synthetic materials and autologous rectus fascia. We report our experience with autologous fascia lata used for abdominal sacral colpopexy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified all women who underwent abdominal sacral colpopexy using autologous fascia lata for vaginal vault prolapse with at least 18 months of followup. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores, relevant clinical and operative parameters, treatment efficacy, harvest site morbidity and patient satisfaction were assessed.
RESULTS: Ten women underwent this procedure between 1999 and 2001. Mean patient age was 68.3 years (range 55 to 82). Followup was 19 to 42 months (mean +/- SD 30.5 +/- 7.78). Preoperatively POP-Q stages were II to IV in 3, 5 and 2 cases, respectively. Postoperative POP-Q scores improved to and remained at stage II or lower in all 10 patients. Mean operative time was 182 +/- 40.94 minutes (range 136 to 265). Mean blood loss was 107.5 +/- 50.07 cc (range 50 to 200). There was no morbidity associated with fascia lata harvest. Eight of the 9 women alive at review completed and returned the survey. When asked if they could return to how they were before surgery, would they still have the same procedure done and would they recommend the procedure to a friend, all respondents answered yes to each question.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fascia lata compares favorably in efficacy to that reported for other materials in the contemporary literature and it is not associated with any significant morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767295     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000103925.56765.bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Lesley N Otto; John O Bergstrom; Amanda L Clark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-01-12

Review 2.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James M Weinberger; Karyn S Eilber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Transabdominal sacrocolpopexy with autologous rectus fascia graft.

Authors:  Nitya Abraham; Adrienne Quirouet; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Current trends and future perspectives in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Mélanie Aubé; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.