Literature DB >> 14767286

Prostate cancer radiotherapy dose response: an update of the fox chase experience.

Alan Pollack1, Alexandra L Hanlon, Eric M Horwitz, Steven J Feigenberg, Robert G Uzzo, Gerald E Hanks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of increasing radiotherapy dose for men with prostate cancer was evaluated with reference to prognostic groups as defined by pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, T stage and perineural invasion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 839 men treated between April 1989 and December 1997 with conformal radiotherapy alone. Cox multivariate analysis was used to establish important predictors of biochemical failure (BF) separately for patients with an initial pretreatment PSA (iPSA) of less than 10, 10 to 19.9, or 20 or greater ng/ml. Radiotherapy (RT) dose was evaluated as a continuous and categorical (dose groups of less than 72, 72 to 75.9 and 76 Gy or greater) variable.
RESULTS: At a median 63-month followup multivariate analysis demonstrated that iPSA and radiotherapy (RP) dose were the most significant predictors of BF, followed by Gleason score and T stage. Perineural invasion was not an independent correlate of outcome. RT dose was significant in all iPSA groups (less than 10, 10 to 19.9 and 20 or greater ng/ml). Gleason score was significant when iPSA was less than 10 ng/ml. T stage was significant when iPSA was 20 ng/ml or greater and it was borderline when iPSA was 10 to 19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.08). Prognostic subgroups were derived from these results and tested for an effect of RT dose on univariate analysis. Radiation dose was not a correlate of BF in the most favorable (PSA less than 10 ng/ml and Gleason score 2 to 6) and the most unfavorable (PSA 20 ng/ml or greater and stage T3-T4) prognostic groups but it was otherwise an influential determinant of outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: RT dose escalation to 76 Gy or greater improved patient outcome for all prognostic groups except those at the favorable and unfavorable extremes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767286     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  32 in total

1.  Be it resolved that in the modern era, the best method for dose escalation is brachytherapy: The con position.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  3-D Conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer within an Austrian-German multicenter trial: a prospective study of patients' acceptance of the rectal balloon during treatment.

Authors:  Gregor Goldner; Hans Geinitz; Stefan Wachter; Gerd Becker; Frank Zimmermann; Natascha Wachter-Gerstner; Stefan Glocker; Regina Pötzi; Andre Wambersie; Michael Bamberg; Michael Molls; Horst Feldmann; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  [Radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Herfarth; F Sterzing
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Perineural Invasion and Risk of Lethal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Richard Flavin; Masis Isikbay; Jennifer R Rider; Travis A Gerke; Stephen Finn; Andreas Pettersson; Francesca Giunchi; Robert H Unger; Alex M Tinianow; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Katja Fall; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  [Radiotherapy of prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Krause; K Herfarth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tony Y Eng; Join Y Luh; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely at radical prostatectomy? decision curve analysis of European Society of Urologic Oncology criteria.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Fernando J Bianco; Angel Cronin; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Thomas N Eade; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Gerald E Hanks; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Positional reproducibility and effects of a rectal balloon in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae Ho Cho; Chang-Geol Lee; Dae Ryong Kang; Jooho Kim; Sangkyu Lee; Chang-Ok Suh; Jinsil Seong; Yang Gun Suh; Ikjae Lee; Gwi Eon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.