Literature DB >> 14766528

Methodology for motor learning: a paradigm for kinematic feedback.

R A Schmidt1, D E Young.   

Abstract

Knowledge of results (KR)--information feedback about goal achievement--has been one of the most extensively examined variables in motor learning. In most natural movement learning situations, however, instructors more common]y provide augmented information regarding various kinematic or kinetic aspects of the movement pattern itself (sometimes termed knowledge of performance, KP). But despite the inherent interest in kinematic feedback, several factors reviewed here have operated to inhibit its study, the most important of which has been the lack of a suitable laboratory task and paradigm. The limitations of earlier paradigms have concerned (a) the use of overly simple motor behaviors, probably to minimize the problems in kinematic measurement, (b) the tendency for the environmental goal or the task to be isomorphic with the kinematic pattern, and (c) thc failure to use transfer or retention tests as measures of learning effects of the feedback manipulations. In this article, we describe our efforts to create a new paradigm for kinematic feedback, the rationale for its development, and the details of its operation. Finally, we provide evidence that the task and paradigm are sensitive to manipulations of kinematic feedback, providing some assurance that the paradigm can potentially answer future research questions about the role of kinematic feedback for learning.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 14766528     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1991.9941590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  8 in total

1.  Effects of three feedback conditions on aerobic swim speeds.

Authors:  Pedro Pérez; Salvador Llana; Gabriel Brizuela; Alberto Encarnación
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

3.  Effects of implicit visual feedback distortion on human gait.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Kim; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of feedback on volitional manipulation of airway protection during swallowing.

Authors:  Phoebe Macrae; Cheryl Anderson; Isha Taylor-Kamara; Ianessa Humbert
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Survey of international regional anesthesia fellowship directors.

Authors:  Andrew K Lansdown; Paul G McHardy; Sanjiv C Patel; Catherine M Nix; Colin Jl McCartney
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Frequency of provision of knowledge of performance on skill acquisition in older persons.

Authors:  Marcelo E S Nunes; Marina G T X Souza; Luciano Basso; Carlos B M Monteiro; Umberto C Corrêa; Suely Santos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 7.  Robot-Assisted Therapy in Upper Extremity Hemiparesis: Overview of an Evidence-Based Approach.

Authors:  Christophe Duret; Anne-Gaëlle Grosmaire; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Walking Speed Influences the Effects of Implicit Visual Feedback Distortion on Modulation of Gait Symmetry.

Authors:  Gabrielle Maestas; Jiyao Hu; Jessica Trevino; Pranathi Chunduru; Seung-Jae Kim; Hyunglae Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.