OBJECTIVE: Uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to review the presentation, therapy and outcome of patients with leiomyosarcoma originating from the uterus treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1990 to 1999. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done to patients treated for uterine leiomyosarcoma during the study period. One author reviewed all available histologic specimens. Statistical analysis was done to determine whether there is an association between histologic criteria or therapy used and overall survival. RESULTS: Forty-seven charts were reviewed to identify 27 patients with leiomyosarcoma arising from the uterus treated in the decade from 1990 to 1999. Most patients received multimodality therapy with surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients who had no visible disease at the conclusion of primary surgery had a better overall survival than patients who did not achieve surgical remission (P < 0.0003). There is a trend toward improved survival in patients with lower number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields (P = 0. 062). Current chemotherapy drugs were minimally effective with 80% of treated patients having progression of disease. Adjuvant therapy after optimal cytoreduction does not decrease the rate of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Uterine leiomyosarcoma continues to be a deadly disease. Aggressive surgical cytoreduction at the time of initial diagnosis offers the possibility of prolonged survival or cure.
OBJECTIVE: Uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to review the presentation, therapy and outcome of patients with leiomyosarcoma originating from the uterus treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1990 to 1999. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done to patients treated for uterine leiomyosarcoma during the study period. One author reviewed all available histologic specimens. Statistical analysis was done to determine whether there is an association between histologic criteria or therapy used and overall survival. RESULTS: Forty-seven charts were reviewed to identify 27 patients with leiomyosarcoma arising from the uterus treated in the decade from 1990 to 1999. Most patients received multimodality therapy with surgery followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Patients who had no visible disease at the conclusion of primary surgery had a better overall survival than patients who did not achieve surgical remission (P < 0.0003). There is a trend toward improved survival in patients with lower number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields (P = 0. 062). Current chemotherapy drugs were minimally effective with 80% of treated patients having progression of disease. Adjuvant therapy after optimal cytoreduction does not decrease the rate of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Uterine leiomyosarcoma continues to be a deadly disease. Aggressive surgical cytoreduction at the time of initial diagnosis offers the possibility of prolonged survival or cure.
Authors: Oliver Zivanovic; Lindsay M Jacks; Alexia Iasonos; Mario M Leitao; Robert A Soslow; Emanuela Veras; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Murray F Brennan; Martee L Hensley Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eytan Ben-Ami; Constance M Barysauskas; Sarah Solomon; Kadija Tahlil; Rita Malley; Melissa Hohos; Kathleen Polson; Margaret Loucks; Mariano Severgnini; Tara Patel; Amy Cunningham; Scott J Rodig; F Stephen Hodi; Jeffrey A Morgan; Priscilla Merriam; Andrew J Wagner; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Suzanne George Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rebecca C Arend; Michael D Toboni; Allison M Montgomery; Robert A Burger; Alexander B Olawaiye; Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-08-23
Authors: Martee L Hensley; Brigitte A Barrette; Klaus Baumann; David Gaffney; Anne L Hamilton; Jae-Weon Kim; Johanna U Maenpaa; Patricia Pautier; Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui; Anneke M Westermann; Isabelle Ray-Coquard Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Paulina Cybulska; Vasileios Sioulas; Theofano Orfanelli; Oliver Zivanovic; Jennifer J Mueller; Vance A Broach; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Dennis S Chi; Kaled M Alektiar; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kristelle Lusby; Kari Brewer Savannah; Elizabeth G Demicco; Yiqun Zhang; Markus Ph Ghadimi; Eric D Young; Chiara Colombo; Ryan Lam; Tugce E Dogan; Jason L Hornick; Alexander J Lazar; Kelly K Hunt; Matthew L Anderson; Chad J Creighton; Dina Lev; Raphael E Pollock Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Gary Levy; Micah J Hill; Torie C Plowden; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Elizabeth K Nugent; Israel Zighelboim; Ashley S Case; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch; L Stewart Massad Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-07-04 Impact factor: 5.482