Literature DB >> 14765863

Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of the infected total knee replacement.

P Dixon1, E N Parish, M J Cross.   

Abstract

Infection is a potentially disastrous complication of total knee replacement (TKR). Retention of the prosthesis has been associated with high rates of persistent infection. Our study shows that in selected situations, arthroscopic debridement may allow retention of the prosthesis and eradication of the infection. However, the prosthesis must be stable, the surgical technique must be meticulous and specific antibiotics must be taken for a lengthy period. Arthroscopic debridement should be considered as an alternative to an open technique, or revision, for the infected TKR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14765863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of arthroscopy in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Heaven; Darren de Sa; Andrew Duong; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Custom-made articulating spacer in two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. An early follow-up of 14 cases of at least 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Pascale; Walter Pascale
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

3.  Direct exchange endoprosthetic reconstruction with tumour prosthesis for periprosthetic knee infection associated with segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Manjunath Ramappa; Ian McMurtry; Andrew Port
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-01-12

4.  [Infected knee prostheses. Part 2: chronic late infections].

Authors:  P Herrmann; P Thoele; V Heppert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  [Infected knee prostheses. Part 1: early infection or acute hematogenous infection].

Authors:  P Herrmann; P Thoele; V Heppert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S J Nickinson; T N Board; A K Gambhir; M L Porter; P R Kay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Pathogen-driven decision for implant retention in the management of infected total knee prostheses.

Authors:  Line Zürcher-Pfund; Ilker Uçkay; Laurence Legout; Axel Gamulin; Pierre Vaudaux; Robin Peter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Surgical Technique: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Moneer M Abouljoud; David Backstein; Andrew Battenberg; Matthew Dietz; Alejo Erice; Andrew A Freiberg; Jeffrey Granger; Adam Katchky; Anton Khlopas; Tae-Kyun Kim; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yona Kosashvili; Percia Lazarovski; Jennifer Leighton; Adolph Lombardi; Konstantinos Malizos; Jorge Manrique; Michael A Mont; Marianthe Papanagiotoy; Rafael J Sierra; Nipun Sodhi; John Stammers; Maik Stiehler; Timothy L Tan; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Derek Ward; Anna Ziogkou
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders Henricson; Radek Wojtowicz; Kjell G Nilsson; Sead Crnalic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated with 'DAIR' (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome.

Authors:  I Byren; P Bejon; B L Atkins; B Angus; S Masters; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; A Berendt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.