Literature DB >> 14764644

Partly nonparametric approach for determining the limit of detection.

Kristian Linnet1, Marina Kondratovich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to recent International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards, the limit of detection (LoD) of an assay should be estimated taking both type I (alpha) and II (beta) errors into account. The suggested procedure, however, supposes gaussian distributions of both blank and sample measurements and a linear calibration curve. In clinical chemistry, asymmetric, nongaussian blank distributions are common, and the calibration curve may be nonlinear. We present a partly nonparametric procedure that takes these aspects into account.
METHODS: Using theoretical distribution models and simulation studies, we developed a LoD estimation procedure suitable for the field of clinical chemistry that is partly based on nonparametric statistics.
RESULTS: For sample size n, the nonparametrically determined 95th percentile of the blank measurements obtained as the value of the [n(95/100) + 0.5]th ordered observation defines the limit for results significantly exceeding zero [limit of blank (LoB)]. The LoD is the lowest value that is likely to yield a result exceeding the LoB. LoD is estimated as: LoB + cbeta x SDS, where SDS is the analytical SD of a sample with a low concentration; cbeta = z(1 - beta)/[1 - 1/(4 x f)]; z(1 - beta) is the standard normal deviate; and f is the number of degrees of freedom for estimation of SD(S). c(beta) is approximately equal to 1.65 for a type II error of 5%. Approaches and needed tabular values for calculation of confidence limits are presented as well as sample size. Worked examples are given to illustrate estimation and verification of the limit of detection. Simulation results are used to document performance.
CONCLUSION: The proposed procedure appears useful for application in the field of clinical chemistry and promotes a standardized approach for estimating LoDs of clinical chemistry assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14764644     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  16 in total

1.  Nonlinear Regression Improves Accuracy of Characterization of Multiplexed Mass Spectrometric Assays.

Authors:  Cyril Galitzine; Jarrett D Egertson; Susan Abbatiello; Clark M Henderson; Lindsay K Pino; Michael MacCoss; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Olga Vitek
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Digital PCR: A Sensitive and Precise Method for KIT D816V Quantification in Mastocytosis.

Authors:  Georg Greiner; Michael Gurbisz; Franz Ratzinger; Nadine Witzeneder; Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp; Gerlinde Mitterbauer-Hohendanner; Matthias Mayerhofer; Leonhard Müllauer; Wolfgang R Sperr; Peter Valent; Gregor Hoermann
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution.

Authors:  Hasmik Keshishian; Terri Addona; Michael Burgess; D R Mani; Xu Shi; Eric Kuhn; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  How to deal with non-detectable and outlying values in biomarker research: Best practices and recommendations for univariate imputation approaches.

Authors:  Judith Herbers; Robert Miller; Andreas Walther; Lena Schindler; Kornelius Schmidt; Wei Gao; Florian Rupprecht
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2021-03-29

5.  Development and validation of an immunosensor for monocyte chemotactic protein 1 using a silicon photonic microring resonator biosensing platform.

Authors:  Enrique Valera; Winnie W Shia; Ryan C Bailey
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.281

6.  Automation of o-dianisidine assay for ceruloplasmin activity analyses: usefulness of investigation in Wilson's disease and in hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Mariacristina Siotto; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Massimo Marano; Rosanna Squitti
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Change-point models to estimate the limit of detection.

Authors:  Ryan C May; Haitao Chu; Joseph G Ibrahim; Michael G Hudgens; Abigail C Lees; David M Margolis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Real-time DNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  Arjang Hassibi; Haris Vikalo; José Luis Riechmann; Babak Hassibi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Highly precise measurement of HIV DNA by droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Matthew C Strain; Steven M Lada; Tiffany Luong; Steffney E Rought; Sara Gianella; Valeri H Terry; Celsa A Spina; Christopher H Woelk; Douglas D Richman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Statistical characterization of multiple-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assays for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  D R Mani; Susan E Abbatiello; Steven A Carr
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.