| Literature DB >> 14764213 |
Mayuko Motobe1, Norio Murase, Takuya Osada, Toshiyuki Homma, Chihoko Ueda, Takeshi Nagasawa, Aya Kitahara, Shiro Ichimura, Yuko Kurosawa, Toshihito Katsumura, Akinori Hoshika, Takafumi Hamaoka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this research inactivity was simulated by immobilizing the forearm region in a plaster cast. Changes in skeletal muscle oxidative function were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and the preventative effect of the training protocol on deterioration of skeletal muscle and the clinical utility of NIRS were examined.Entities:
Year: 2004 PMID: 14764213 PMCID: PMC343296 DOI: 10.1186/1476-5918-3-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dyn Med ISSN: 1476-5918
Figure 1a. Schematic representation of VOSchematic representation of VO2mus and typical changes in muscle oxygenated Hb/Mb at rest, during exercise, and recovery. VO2mus was calculated from the rate of the decline of the oxygenated Hb/Mb during arterial occlusion at rest (Slope rest) and recovery period (Slope recovery). b. Typical kinetics of VO. Typical kinetics of VO2mus recovery after exercise. Time constant for this subject was 55.8 s (pre) → 54.7 s (post).
Figure 2Method to determine muscle oxygenation level and Tr. Method to determine muscle oxygenation level and Tr, the time required to reach the value halfway between the muscle oxygenation level immediately after exercise and that at peak hyperemia during recovery. The m-O2 value during exercise was defined as the minimum relative oxygenation level during exercise.
Results of measurements of Control group, IMM group and IMM+TRN group before and after immobilization. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. Statistically significant differences from pre: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
| TcVo2mus (sec.) | Tr (sec.) | |||
| pre | post | pre | post | |
| CON | 51.6 ± 4.7 | 56.8 ± 10.5 | 10.5 ± 3.2 | 7.7 ± 1.8 |
| IMM | 59.7 ± 5.8 | 70.4 ± 5.8** | 9.8 ± 3.0 | 9.9 ± 3.2 |
| IMM+TRN | 78.3 ± 6.2 | 63.1 ± 5.6* | 8.0 ± 1.4 | 7.2 ± 1.3 |
| grip strength (kg) | arm circumferences (cm) | |||
| pre | post | pre | post | |
| CON | 44.3 ± 2.0 | 44.7 ± 2.7 | 25.8 ± 0.5 | 25.7 ± 0.4 |
| IMM | 40.6 ± 2.1 | 34.3 ± 2.3** | 25.0 ± 0.3 | 24.8 ± 0.3 |
| IMM+TRN | 44.9 ± 2.4 | 37.5 ± 2.7** | 26.3 ± 0.7 | 26.0 ± 0.6* |
| duration of grip exercise <absolute load> (sec.) | ||||
| pre | post | |||
| CON | 52.2 ± 2.3 | 49.2 ± 2.7 | ||
| IMM | 50.3 ± 2.0 | 40.5 ± 2.3 | P = 0.05 | |
| IMM+TRN | 46.3 ± 3.8 | 47.8 ± 4.8 | ||
| duration of grip exercise <relative load> (sec.) | ||||
| pre | post | |||
| CON | 52.3 ± 5.1 | 49.1 ± 5.9 | ||
| IMM | 50.3 ± 4.9 | 47.5 ± 11.3 | ||
| IMM+TRN | 46.3 ± 9.2 | 56.3 ± 5.2* | ||
Figure 3The relationship between the changes of TcVORepresentation of the relationship between changes over the course of immobilization in TcVO2mus and grip exercise duration time (absolute load). A correlative trend (r = 0.55, p = 0.07) was observed between the two.
Figure 4The relationship between the changes of TcVORepresentation of the relationship between changes over the course of immobilization in TcVO2mus and grip exercise duration time (relative load). A correlative trend (r = 0.57, p = 0.05) was observed between the two.