Literature DB >> 14763466

Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia.

Mihai Pop1, Yves Payette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study a paired-match comparison between refractive lens exchange with pseudophakic IOL implant (RLE) and Artisan phakic IOL for high hyperopia.
METHODS: Nineteen eyes (12 patients, 20 to 41 years old) with an Artisan phakic IOL (Model 203: 1.00-D increment) for hyperopia from +2.75 to +9.25 D were matched to 19 eyes (15 patients, 26 to 46 yr) with hyperopia from +2.75 to +7.50 D, who had refractive lens exchange (pseudophakic IOL implantation; lenses: 0.50-D increment). Average paired-match difference was 1.13 D and 7.7 years of age.
RESULTS: At 1 month after surgery, 84% of refractive lens exchange/pseudophakic IOL eyes and 94% of Artisan phakic IOL eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia; 58% and 68% of eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D (P = .97). No eye lost lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and no significant changes in BSCVA were found in any eye at 1 month after surgery (P = .17). The percentage of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better improved from 79% to 89% of eyes at 1 to 2 months after phakic IOL; it remained at 89% to 82% of eyes from 1 to 2 months after refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL. The coefficient of correlation showed statistically better accuracy (intended vs. achieved refraction; P = .035) for the Artisan phakic IOL (R = 0.83) than for refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL (R = 0.50).
CONCLUSIONS: Spherical equivalent refraction outcome and BSCVA after surgery were similar for both procedures. The Artisan phakic IOL in carefully selected patients provided a better overall outcome for young patients with high hyperopia whose accommodation was preserved, as compared to refractive lens exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14763466     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20040101-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part II. Phakic posterior chamber lenses and refractive lens exchange with posterior chamber lens implantation].

Authors:  T Kohnen; T Kasper; E Terzi
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Intraocular lenses for the correction of refraction errors. Part 1: phakic anterior chamber lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Baumeister; M Cichocki
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [The basics of refractive lens exchange].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Contralateral Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation as Rehabilitation of Refractive Lens Exchange with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens in a Young, Nonpresbyopic, Bilateral Highly-Myopic Patient.

Authors:  Kepa Balparda; Claudia Marcela Vanegas-Ramírez; Laura Segura-Muñoz; Manuela Gómez-Londoño
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 6.  Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it?

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Andrzej Grzybowski; Dorota Romaniuk
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 7.  Iris-fixated intraocular lenses for ametropia and aphakia.

Authors:  Pedro S Simões; Tiago B Ferreira
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2014
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.