Literature DB >> 14762849

Hepatic arterial 90Yttrium glass microspheres (Therasphere) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: interim safety and survival data on 65 patients.

Brian I Carr1.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) generally arises in a cirrhotic liver and, in most cases, is multifocal and bilobar. Although trans-hepatic artery chemoembolization (TACE) can be highly affective in shrinking tumors, it is limited by virtue of the damage that it can cause to the liver that is already damaged by chronic disease. A high priority in HCC research, after primary prevention and early detection, is to find new treatment modalities that are both effective and non-toxic to the underlying cirrhotic liver. A cohort of 65 patients with biopsy-proven unresectable HCC have been treated with hepatic arterial 90Yttrium microspheres (Therasphere), and the interim results are reported here. Only 1 cycle of Therasphere treatment ever was performed on 46 patients, 17 patients had 2 cycles, and 2 patients had 3 cycles of therapy. The median dose delivered was 134 Gy, typically as either 5 or 10 GBq (2-4 million microspheres). Clinical toxicities include 9 episodes of abdominal pain and 2 episodes of acute cholecystitis, requiring cholecystectomy. A main lab toxicity was elevated bilirubin which increased by more than 200% in 25 patients (30.5%) during 6 months of therapy, although 18 of these patients had only transient elevation. A prominent finding was prolonged and profound (>70%) lymphopenia in more than 75% of the patients, but without clinical significance. Forty-two patients (64.6%) had a substantial decrease in tumor vascularity in response to therapy, and 25 patients (38.4%) had a partial response, by computed tomography scan. Median survival for Okuda stage I patients (n=42) was 649 days (historical comparison 244) and for Okuda stage II patients (n=23) was 302 days (historical comparison 64 days). All patients were followed after therapy for a minimum of 6 months. There were 42 deaths, 21 due to liver failure, 6 from HCC progression, and 3 from metastases. Therasphere appears to be a relatively safe and effective therapy for advanced-stage unresectable HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762849     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  69 in total

1.  Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and microsphere embolization for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Jiajie Zang; Xiaojing Guo; Feng Xu; Rongxi Shen; Long Yan; Jiamei Yang; Jia He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Hepatic radioembolization complicated by gastrointestinal ulceration.

Authors:  Jeremy Collins; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Predictors of repeat transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jared A White; David T Redden; Mary Kate Bryant; David Dorn; Souheil Saddekni; Ahmed Kamel Abdel Aal; Jessica Zarzour; David Bolus; J Kevin Smith; Stephen Gray; Devin E Eckhoff; Derek A DuBay
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Lisa Bodei; Carlo Chiesa; Glenn Flux; Flavio Forrer; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere; Boudewijn Brans; Bieke Lambert; Mark Konijnenberg; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Jan Tennvall; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Radioembolization of yttrium-90 microspheres for hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Ravi Murthy; Paresh Kamat; Rodolfo Nuñez; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  The effects of hepatic artery chemotherapy on viral hepatitis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jawad Ahmad; John Rhee; Brian I Carr
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno-Luna; Ju Dong Yang; William Sanchez; Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli; Denise M Harnois; Teresa A Mettler; Denise N Gansen; Piet C de Groen; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; K V Narayanan Menon; Nicholas F Larusso; Steven R Alberts; Gregory J Gores; Chad J Fleming; Seth W Slettedahl; William S Harmsen; Terry M Therneau; Gregory A Wiseman; James C Andrews; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Liver embolizations in oncology. A review. Part II. Arterial radioembolizations, portal venous embolizations, experimental arterial embolization procedures.

Authors:  Peter Gunvén
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 9.  Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and perspectives.

Authors:  Cristina Mosconi; Alberta Cappelli; Cinzia Pettinato; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.