BACKGROUND & AIMS: 5-Fluorouracil improves mortality in stage III colorectal cancer patients. In vitro studies suggest that microsatellite instability influences cell survival after 5-fluorouracil treatment. We investigated the survival influence of 5-fluorouracil in patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors. METHODS: We collected data and tumors on 204 consecutive stage II and III colorectal cancer patients from registries at the University of California and Veterans Administration hospitals in San Diego, California, from 1982 to 1999. Archival DNA was extracted, and microsatellite instability was assessed by National Cancer Institute-recommended markers. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine survival associations for microsatellite instability and 5-fluorouracil treatment status. RESULTS: We identified 36 microsatellite instability-high (17.6%) and 168 non-microsatellite instability-high tumors (82.4%). Microsatellite instability-high tumors were significantly associated with proximal colon location, presence of mucin, and surrounding lymphoid reaction. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no survival difference between microsatellite instability-high and non-microsatellite instability-high groups (hazard ratio, 1.04; P = 0.88). Dichotomized by use of 5-fluorouracil, there was increased risk of death in patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 2.02; P = 0.02). However, the benefit of 5-fluorouracil was different between microsatellite instability-high and non-microsatellite instability-high groups. Patients with non-microsatellite instability-high tumors who received 5-fluorouracil had better survival compared with patients who were not treated (P < 0.05). Conversely, patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors who were treated with 5-fluorouracil had no survival difference compared with patients without treatment (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: There is improved survival in patients with non-microsatellite instability-high tumors after 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy that does not extend to patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors. The microsatellite instability status of a patient's colorectal cancer may indicate differences in 5-fluorouracil-based chemosensitivity; this is consistent with in vitro studies.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:5-Fluorouracil improves mortality in stage III colorectal cancerpatients. In vitro studies suggest that microsatellite instability influences cell survival after 5-fluorouracil treatment. We investigated the survival influence of 5-fluorouracil in patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors. METHODS: We collected data and tumors on 204 consecutive stage II and III colorectal cancerpatients from registries at the University of California and Veterans Administration hospitals in San Diego, California, from 1982 to 1999. Archival DNA was extracted, and microsatellite instability was assessed by National Cancer Institute-recommended markers. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine survival associations for microsatellite instability and 5-fluorouracil treatment status. RESULTS: We identified 36 microsatellite instability-high (17.6%) and 168 non-microsatellite instability-high tumors (82.4%). Microsatellite instability-high tumors were significantly associated with proximal colon location, presence of mucin, and surrounding lymphoid reaction. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no survival difference between microsatellite instability-high and non-microsatellite instability-high groups (hazard ratio, 1.04; P = 0.88). Dichotomized by use of 5-fluorouracil, there was increased risk of death in patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 2.02; P = 0.02). However, the benefit of 5-fluorouracil was different between microsatellite instability-high and non-microsatellite instability-high groups. Patients with non-microsatellite instability-high tumors who received 5-fluorouracil had better survival compared with patients who were not treated (P < 0.05). Conversely, patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors who were treated with 5-fluorouracil had no survival difference compared with patients without treatment (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: There is improved survival in patients with non-microsatellite instability-high tumors after 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy that does not extend to patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors. The microsatellite instability status of a patient's colorectal cancer may indicate differences in 5-fluorouracil-based chemosensitivity; this is consistent with in vitro studies.
Authors: Rodrigo Jover; Thuy-Phuong Nguyen; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Pedro Zapater; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; Estefanía Rojas; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Juan D Morillas; Juan Clofent; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Xavier Bessa; Rosa M Xicola; David Nicolás-Pérez; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Xavier Llor; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Allison M Eaton; Robert Sandler; John M Carethers; Robert C Millikan; Joseph Galanko; Temitope O Keku Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Wilfredo E De Jesus-Monge; Carmen Gonzalez-Keelan; Ronghua Zhao; Stanley R Hamilton; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Marcia Cruz-Correa Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Long Shan Li; Julio C Morales; Martina Veigl; David Sedwick; Sheldon Greer; Mark Meyers; Mark Wagner; Richard Fishel; David A Boothman Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 8.739