Literature DB >> 14762496

A randomized, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and hydroxyzine for pediatric dental sedation.

Alessandra Rodrigues de Almeida Lima1, Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costa, Paulo Sérgio Sucasas da Costa.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of oral midazolam in pediatric dentistry is controversial. This randomized, controlled, crossover, double blind clinical trial was conducted in order to study the effect of midazolam, used either alone or in association with hydroxyzine, during child dental treatment. Thirty seven dental sedation sessions were carried out on 11 ASA I uncooperative children less than five years-old. In each appointment children were randomly assigned to groups: P - placebo, M - midazolam (1.0 mg/kg), or MH - midazolam (0.75 mg/kg) plus hydroxyzine (2.0 mg/kg). Vital signs (blood pressure, breathing rate, pulse and oxygen saturation) and behavior parameters (consciousness, crying, movement, overall behavior) were evaluated every 15 minutes. Friedman and Wilcoxon statistical tests were used to compare groups and different moments in the same group. Normal values of vital signs were usually registered. Heart rate increased in groups P and M as the session went on. Group M presented less crying and movement at the first 15 minutes of treatment. Group MH caused more drowsiness at the beginning of the session. Overall behavior was better in group M than in groups P or MH. Group M produced effective sedation in 77% of the cases, and group MH did so in 30.8%. It was concluded that midazolam was effective and safe, and its association with hydroxyzine did not lead to additional advantages in pediatric dental sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14762496     DOI: 10.1590/s1517-74912003000300002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pesqui Odontol Bras        ISSN: 1517-7491


  6 in total

1.  Risk factors with intravenous sedation for patients with disabilities.

Authors:  Fumihiro Yoshikawa; Yoh Tamaki; Hisa Okumura; Zenzo Miwa; Masaaki Ishikawa; Kazuhiro Shimoyama; Zenkou Nakamura; Hitomi Kunimori; Shigeharu Jinno; Hikaru Kohase; Haruhisa Fukayama
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

2.  Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

Authors:  Paul F Ashley; Mohsin Chaudhary; Liege Lourenço-Matharu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

3.  Comparison of oral and buccal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized, cross-over, clinical trial for efficacy, acceptance and safety.

Authors:  Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati; Majid Mehran; Roza Haghgoo; Monireh Tohid-Rahbari; Rahil Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.364

4.  Assessing the sedative effect of oral vs submucosal meperidine in pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Lida Toomarian; Katayoun Salem; Ghassem Ansari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03

5.  Sedative Effect of Oral Midazolam/Hydroxyzine versus Chloral Hydrate/Hydroxyzine on 2-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Dental Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari; Mojtaba Vahid Golpayegani; Majid Bargrizan; Ghassem Ansari; Shahnaz Shayeghi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-01-31

6.  Contribution of benzodiazepines in dental care of patients with special needs.

Authors:  Bruna-Lavinas-Sayed Picciani; Bruna-Michalski Dos Santos; Geraldo-Oliveira Silva-Júnior; Marcello-Alves Marinho; Eliane-Garritano Papa; Marcelo-Daniel-Brito Faria; Luciana-Freitas Bastos; Cresus-Vinícius-Depes de Gouvêa
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-12-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.