Literature DB >> 14762461

Research on the value of medical library services: does it make an impact in the health care literature?

Pamela J Sherwill-Navarro1, Addajane L Wallace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact in the health care literature of research articles that provided evidence of the value of library services (including MEDLINE) as an element of quality health care. DATA SOURCES/SELECTION: Four research articles on the relationship between use of library services and quality health care were selected as "primary articles" from a MEDLINE search using appropriate Medical Subject Heading. Primary articles met the following criteria: written in English, reported research, related to clinical care, and published before 1995. DATA EXTRACTION: The technique of citation analysis was used to measure the impact of the primary articles on the subsequent literature. The number, authorship, type, and publication venue of articles citing the primary articles were determined using ISI Web of Science, MEDLINE, other electronic resources, and the citing articles themselves. For the 146 English-language citing articles, the article type (i.e., advocacy, instructional, research) was noted; and, for those that reported research, the use to which the author put the cited material was determined.
RESULTS: The primary articles were cited more often than the average articles published that year in the same journals. At the time of the study each article had been cited almost every year since publication. Of the 146 citing articles written in English, 43% were written by librarians, 38% by physicians, 12% by librarians with physicians. The majority were published in medical journals, followed in order of decreasing frequency by the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, information science journals, and health administration journals.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that published research on the value of medical library services has an impact on the literature. These articles are read and cited and continue to be of value.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762461      PMCID: PMC314101     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  9 in total

1.  A snapshot in time: citation rankings of the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

Authors:  J M Homan
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-01

2.  A bibliometric analysis of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  K V Kuhlemeier
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  The hospital library is crucial to quality healthcare.

Authors:  R A Palmer
Journal:  Hosp Top       Date:  1991

4.  How can impact factors be improved?

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

5.  Comparing and using assessments of the value of information to clinical decision-making.

Authors:  C J Urquhart; J B Hepworth
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1996-10

6.  The contribution of hospital library information services to clinical care: a study in eight hospitals.

Authors:  D N King
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1987-10

7.  Scientific publications of a medical school faculty.

Authors:  R B Krumland; E E Will; G A Gorry
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-11

8.  Educational services in health sciences libraries: an analysis of the periodical literature, 1975-1986.

Authors:  M J Zachert
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1987-07

9.  Publication productivity ranking questioned.

Authors:  V Neale
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.756

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Measuring the value and impact of health sciences libraries: planning an update and replication of the Rochester Study.

Authors:  Kathel Dunn; Karen Brewer; Joanne Gard Marshall; Julia Sollenberger
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.