PURPOSE: Most cataract surgery is now performed under local anaesthesia on a day-case basis. As patients are fully conscious during the procedure, it is important that they remain still. There are a variety of reasons why patients may need to move, and it is important that the surgeon is made aware that this may happen. Some centres offer a nurse's hand as a means of perioperative patient communication. We sought to study the safety and efficacy of using an electronic patient-controlled alert device. METHOD: We compared hand-holding with the use of a patient alert device, and with both communication methods at the same time, on 150 subjects undergoing cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. Assessment of pre- and postoperative state anxiety was undertaken and patients' satisfaction with the communication strategies was assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative state anxiety for each group (P<0.001) but no significant differences in pre-, peri-, or postoperative state anxiety between groups. There were no significant differences in confidence, pain, understanding, satisfaction, memory, and reassurance between the three groups. A total of 46% of all patients reported experiencing one or more of the potential problems enquired about, during the operation. Significant correlations were also identified between some of the psychological variables investigated. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic patient alert device is as effective a means of perioperative patient communication as holding a nurse's hand, during cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. It is safe, reassuring and it allows patients to communicate directly with the surgeon.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Most cataract surgery is now performed under local anaesthesia on a day-case basis. As patients are fully conscious during the procedure, it is important that they remain still. There are a variety of reasons why patients may need to move, and it is important that the surgeon is made aware that this may happen. Some centres offer a nurse's hand as a means of perioperative patient communication. We sought to study the safety and efficacy of using an electronic patient-controlled alert device. METHOD: We compared hand-holding with the use of a patient alert device, and with both communication methods at the same time, on 150 subjects undergoing cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. Assessment of pre- and postoperative state anxiety was undertaken and patients' satisfaction with the communication strategies was assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative state anxiety for each group (P<0.001) but no significant differences in pre-, peri-, or postoperative state anxiety between groups. There were no significant differences in confidence, pain, understanding, satisfaction, memory, and reassurance between the three groups. A total of 46% of all patients reported experiencing one or more of the potential problems enquired about, during the operation. Significant correlations were also identified between some of the psychological variables investigated. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic patient alert device is as effective a means of perioperative patient communication as holding a nurse's hand, during cataract surgery under local anaesthesia. It is safe, reassuring and it allows patients to communicate directly with the surgeon.
Authors: Tanika Kelay; Emmanuel Ako; Christopher Cook; Mohammad Yasin; Matthew Gold; Kah Leong Chan; Fernando Bello; Roger K Kneebone; Iqbal S Malik Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2018-11-29
Authors: Natalie Sadlak; Marissa G Fiorello; Howard J Cabral; Manju L Subramanian; Manishi A Desai; Hyunjoo J Lee Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2022-03-06