Literature DB >> 14762094

Genotype x environment interaction for grazing vs. confinement. II. Health and reproduction traits.

J F Kearney1, M M Schutz, P J Boettcher.   

Abstract

Continual selection for increased milk yield for more than 40 yr, combined with the antagonistic relationship between increasing yield, somatic cell count, and fertility, have resulted in sires that may not be optimal for producing daughters for grazing systems where seasonal calving is very important. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible existence of a genotype x environment interaction (G x E) in grazing vs. confinement herds within the United States for lactation average somatic cell score (LSCS), days open (DO), days to first service (DFS), and number of services per conception (SPC). Grazing herds were defined as those that utilized grazing for at least 6 mo each year and were enrolled in Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI). Control herds were confinement DHI herds of similar size in the same states. For LSCS, the performance of daughters in grazing and control herds was examined using linear regression of LSCS on the November 2000 USDA-DHIA sire predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) for SCS. Genetic parameters for all traits were estimated using REML in a bivariate animal model that treated the same trait in different environments as different traits. Rank correlations were calculated between sires' estimated breeding values for LSCS, calculated separately for sires in both environments. The coefficient of regression of daughter LSCS on sire PTA was less in grazing herds than in control herds. The coefficient of regression for control herds was closer to expectation. Estimates of heritability were approximately 0.12 for LSCS, and less than 0.05 for the reproduction traits. Heritabilities for DO, DFS, and SPC were slightly higher for control herds. Estimates of genetic correlation for each reproductive trait between the 2 environments were high and not significantly different from unity. Generally, these traits appear to be under similar genetic control, but a lower coefficient of regression of LSCS on sire PTA for SCS in grazing herds suggests differences in daughter performance in grazing herds may be overstated based on current PTA for SCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762094     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73190-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Reaction norm model to describe environmental sensitivity across first lactation in dairy cattle under tropical conditions.

Authors:  Annaiza Braga Bignardi; Lenira El Faro; Rodrigo Junqueira Pereira; Denise Rocha Ayres; Paulo Fernando Machado; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Mário Luiz Santana
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Two approaches to account for genotype-by-environment interactions for production traits and age at first calving in South African Holstein cattle.

Authors:  Vincent Ducrocq; Astrid Cadet; Clotilde Patry; Lene van der Westhuizen; Jacob B van Wyk; Frederick Wilhelm Cornelius Neser
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 3.  Selection methods for resistance to and tolerance of helminths in livestock.

Authors:  Concepta McManus; Tiago do Prado Paim; Cristiano Barros de Melo; Bruno S A F Brasil; Samuel R Paiva
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Genomic Selection Improves Response to Selection in Resilience by Exploiting Genotype by Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.