Literature DB >> 14761850

Role of p53 mutations, protein function and DNA damage for the radiosensitivity of human tumour cells.

A Böhnke1, F Westphal, A Schmidt, R A El-Awady, J Dahm-Daphi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The tumour suppressor protein p53 is considered to have an impact on the radiosensitivity of tumour cells. However, this concept does not easily translate to the tumour sensitivity in the clinics. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a functional or dysfunctional p53 is associated with a sensitive or resistant phenotype. It was further studied whether DNA damage might be an additive factor by which p53 has impact on cell survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine human tumour cell lines were studied for p53 mutation by direct sequencing of exons 4-9. Regulation of p53 and p21(cip1/waf1) protein was assessed by immunoblotting and cell cycle effects by combining 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and flow cytometry. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Three strains (RT112, Du145, SCC4451) were found to have a missense-mutation in the core domain and one did not express p53 at all (HeLa), presumably due to HPV18 infection. Immunoblots of these cells showed neither a regulated p53 nor p21 expression. The cells did not arrest in G1 phase after X-irradiation but did arrest in G2/M. All cells expressing wild-type protein (LNCaP, T47D-B8, MCF-7 and sublines BB and Bus) showed an intact p53 and p21 regulation and a modest arrest in both G1 and G2/M. Thus, in contrast to other studies, all tumour cells investigated showed either a typical p53wt or mutant (mut) pattern. Protein function was compared with cell survival and DNA damage, as assessed previously. p53 wild-type cells were on average 1.3-times (n.s.) more radiosensitive than mutant cells, but there was a considerable overlap between both groups. Further, the 1.3-fold enhanced resistance of cells lacking wild-type p53 was paralleled by a 1.3-fold lower number of induced double-strand breaks. The results suggest that p53 could have impact on chromatin compaction and thus effect DNA damage induction and radiosensitivity of tumour cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14761850     DOI: 10.1080/09553000310001642902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  20 in total

1.  mRNA Expression Profiles for Prostate Cancer following Fractionated Irradiation Are Influenced by p53 Status.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; Molykutty John-Aryankalayil; Sanjeewani T Palayoor; Adeola Y Makinde; David Cerna; Michael T Falduto; Scott R Magnuson; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.243

2.  G2-block after irradiation of cells with different p53 status.

Authors:  Friedo Zölzer; Ganesh Jagetia; Christian Streffer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Differential response to ablative ionizing radiation in genetically distinct non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Ayman Oweida; Zeinab Sharifi; Hani Halabi; Yaoxian Xu; Siham Sabri; Bassam Abdulkarim
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Frequency variations in the methylated pattern of p73/p21 genes and chromosomal aberrations correlating with different grades of glioma among south Indian population.

Authors:  Mahalakshmi Palani; Sabarinathan Devan; R Arunkumar; A J Vanisree
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Expression of RAD51, BRCA1 and P53 does not correlate with cellular radiosensitivity of normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  E M Y Saleh; R A E El-Awady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Inhibition of topoisomerase IIα sensitizes FaDu cells to ionizing radiation by diminishing DNA repair.

Authors:  Ekram M Saleh
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-17

7.  The human LINE-1 retrotransposon creates DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Stephen L Gasior; Timothy P Wakeman; Bo Xu; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Targeting prostate cancer based on signal transduction and cell cycle pathways.

Authors:  John T Lee; Brian D Lehmann; David M Terrian; William H Chappell; Franca Stivala; Massimo Libra; Alberto M Martelli; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Radiation-induced double-strand breaks require ATM but not Artemis for homologous recombination during S-phase.

Authors:  Sabrina Köcher; Thorsten Rieckmann; Gabor Rohaly; Wael Y Mansour; Ekkehard Dikomey; Irena Dornreiter; Jochen Dahm-Daphi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genetic evidence that the non-homologous end-joining repair pathway is involved in LINE retrotransposition.

Authors:  Jun Suzuki; Katsumi Yamaguchi; Masaki Kajikawa; Kenji Ichiyanagi; Noritaka Adachi; Hideki Koyama; Shunichi Takeda; Norihiro Okada
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.