J E Moulder1. 1. Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. jmoulder@mcw.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Events of the recent past have focused attention on the possibility of radiological (nuclear) terrorism and on the implications of such terrorist threats for radiation accident preparedness. This review discusses recent advances in the knowledge about how radiation injuries from such events might be treated pharmacologically, and the practical barriers to clinical utilization of these approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of pharmacological approaches are being developed in the laboratory that could greatly expand the ability to treat acute and chronic radiation injuries. However, there are currently a variety of practical and legal barriers that would prevent the actual clinical use of most of the approaches. There are also the potential weaknesses in most of the current programmes for dealing with the consequences of radiation accidents or nuclear terrorism, including the absence of widespread radiation biodosimetry capabilities and the resulting inability to triage. If a major radiation accident or terrorist event occurs, the lack of biodosimetry and treatment capabilities will be compounded by widespread public fear of 'radiation'.
PURPOSE: Events of the recent past have focused attention on the possibility of radiological (nuclear) terrorism and on the implications of such terrorist threats for radiation accident preparedness. This review discusses recent advances in the knowledge about how radiation injuries from such events might be treated pharmacologically, and the practical barriers to clinical utilization of these approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of pharmacological approaches are being developed in the laboratory that could greatly expand the ability to treat acute and chronic radiation injuries. However, there are currently a variety of practical and legal barriers that would prevent the actual clinical use of most of the approaches. There are also the potential weaknesses in most of the current programmes for dealing with the consequences of radiation accidents or nuclear terrorism, including the absence of widespread radiation biodosimetry capabilities and the resulting inability to triage. If a major radiation accident or terrorist event occurs, the lack of biodosimetry and treatment capabilities will be compounded by widespread public fear of 'radiation'.
Authors: Marek Lenarczyk; Eric P Cohen; Brian L Fish; Amy A Irving; Mukut Sharma; Collin D Driscoll; John E Moulder Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Jonathan Hoggatt; Pratibha Singh; Kayla N Stilger; P Artur Plett; Carol H Sampson; Hui Lin Chua; Christie M Orschell; Louis M Pelus Journal: Blood Cells Mol Dis Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Chris O Wambi; Jenine K Sanzari; Carly M Sayers; Manunya Nuth; Zhaozong Zhou; James Davis; Niklas Finnberg; Joan S Lewis-Wambi; Jeffrey H Ware; Wafik S El-Deiry; Ann R Kennedy Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Regina M Day; Michal Barshishat-Kupper; Steven R Mog; Elizabeth A McCart; P G S Prasanna; Thomas A Davis; Michael R Landauer Journal: J Radiat Res Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Michal Hofer; Milan Pospíšil; Ladislav Dušek; Zuzana Hoferová; Denisa Komůrková Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 1.925