Literature DB >> 14760674

Surgical revision after failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

H G Weiss1, W Kirchmayr, A Klaus, H Bonatti, G Mühlmann, H Nehoda, J Himpens, F Aigner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the outcome of surgical revision for complications following laparoscopic placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band (AGB) to treat morbid obesity.
METHODS: Seventy-three (19.1 per cent) of 382 patients who underwent laparoscopic AGB placement between January 1996 and March 2001 presented with complications within 6 years after operation. Revision was carried out with the intention of reinstating the functional device in all patients.
RESULTS: Successful surgical revision or gradual balloon deflation was performed in 53 patients (29 port-related complications, 14 pouch dilatations, 12 band leakages, three oesophageal dilatations, two symptomatic hernias, one late migration, one intracerebral bleed). Of these patients, 51 (96.2 per cent) had a successful outcome according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System following significant additional postinterventional weight loss. AGB removal was carried out in 20 patients (13 early or late migrations, five pouch dilatations, three port-related complications, two psychiatric disorders, one band leakage). The final failure rate for complicated AGB procedures was 30.1 per cent.
CONCLUSION: AGB placement is associated with a variety of complications. In most cases surgical complications can be treated with minimally invasive surgery, which should allow further weight loss and improvement of quality of life during long-term follow-up. Alternative bariatric procedures should be reserved for patients with poor outcome after surgical revision of the AGB. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14760674     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Bariatric emergencies for non-bariatric surgeons: complications of laparoscopic gastric banding.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Leonid Lantsberg; Solly Mizrahi; Eliezer Avinoach
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Long-term follow-up evaluation of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Alexander Perathoner; Matthias Zitt; Monika Lanthaler; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl; Reinhard Mittermair
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Outcomes of routine upper gastrointestinal series screening and surveillance after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Danielle T Friedman; Andrew J Duffy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Revisionary bariatric surgery: indications and outcome of 100 consecutive operations at a single center.

Authors:  Simon Kuesters; Jodok M Grueneberger; Tobias Baumann; Waleed Bukhari; Marc Daoud; Ulrich T Hopt; Wojciech K Karcz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long-term results of bariatric restrictive procedures: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ruben Schouten; Dorothee C Wiryasaputra; Francois M H van Dielen; Wim G van Gemert; Jan Willem M Greve
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Is a pouch compulsory in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding?

Authors:  A Perathoner; H Weiss; W Santner; G Brandacher; E Laimer; E Höller; F Aigner; A Klaus
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Revision of failed primary adjustable gastric banding to mini-gastric bypass: results in 48 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Luigi Piazza; Carla Di Stefano; Francesco Ferrara; Angelo Bellia; Marco Vacante; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-21

8.  Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures?

Authors:  Marco Bueter; Andreas Thalheimer; Alexander Wierlemann; Martin Fein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  3D-MSCT gastric pouch volumetry in bariatric surgery-preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  W K Karcz; S Kuesters; G Marjanovic; D Suesslin; E Kotter; O Thomusch; U T Hopt; G Felmerer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Laparoscopic gastric banding outcomes do not depend on device or technique. long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing the Lapband® and the SAGB®.

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Anna Dayer-Jankechova; Marc Worreth; Vittorio Giusti; Michel Suter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.