Literature DB >> 14760519

Bone mass and lifestyle related factors: a comparative study between Japanese and Inner Mongolian young premenopausal women.

M Zhang1, T Shimmura, L F Bi, H Nagase, H Nishino, E Kajita, M Eto, H B Wang, X L Su, H Chang, T Aratani, S Kagamimori.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ethnic difference in bone mass between Japanese and Inner Mongolian young premenopausal women and to assess the contribution of lifestyle related and anthropometric factors to bone mass. We studied 33 Japanese and 44 Inner Mongolian healthy young women, aged 20-34 years, in urban area. Speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and stiffness index (SI) were measured at the calcaneus using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) analysis. Age at menarche, regularity of menstruation and lifestyle related factors were estimated by a self-reported questionnaire. There were no differences between the two groups in age, height, weight, BMI, regularity of menstruation, frequency of meat intake, frequency of yellow-green vegetable intake and exercise habit. Japanese women had significantly lower age at menarche and higher proportion of milk consumption habit at junior high school, senior school and present. Before adjustment, Japanese women had significantly higher SOS and SI than Inner Mongolian women. However, after adjustment for age at menarche and milk consumption habit at junior high school, both of which were significantly different between groups, no group-differences remained in either SOS or SI. These results suggest that the differences in age at menarche and milk consumption habit at junior high school, which relate to hormonal and nutritional status during puberty, may account for the differences in bone mass between Japanese and Inner Mongolian young women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14760519     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1578-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  18 in total

1.  Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L K Bachrach; T Hastie; M C Wang; B Narasimhan; R Marcus
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Risk of irregular menstrual cycles and low peak bone mass during early adulthood associated with age at menarche.

Authors:  T Anai; F Miyazaki; T Tomiyasu; T Matsuo
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.524

3.  Trends and differentials in menarcheal age in China.

Authors:  Duolao Wang; Michael Murphy
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2002-07

4.  A clinical prediction rule to identify premenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  G A Hawker; S A Jamal; R Ridout; C Chase
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Changes of recollected menarcheal age and month among women in Tokyo over a period of 90 years.

Authors:  I Nakamura; M Shimura; K Nonaka; T Miura
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Age and bone mass in premenopausal women.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; W Mayo-Smith; C W Hayes; J S Khurana; B M Biller; R M Neer; A Klibanski
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Bone mineral density and mass in a cross-sectional study of white and Asian women.

Authors:  M Russell-Aulet; J Wang; J C Thornton; E W Colt; R N Pierson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Evidence for a secular trend in age of menarche.

Authors:  G Wyshak; R E Frisch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A meta-analysis of the effect of calcium intake on bone mass in young and middle aged females and males.

Authors:  D C Welten; H C Kemper; G B Post; W A van Staveren
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Ethnic differences in bone mass of young women vary with method of assessment.

Authors:  Krista T Fielding; Laura K Backrach; Mark L Hudes; Patricia B Crawford; May-Choo Wang
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.