Spero G Karas1, R Alexander Creighton, Gene J DeMorat. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. Spero_Karas@med.unc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to objectively assess glenohumeral volume changes after arthroscopic suture plication, arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy, and combined suture and thermal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Cadaveric study. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver shoulders were treated with either thermal capsulorrhaphy (n = 5) or arthroscopic suture plication (n = 5). The shoulders treated with plication were then treated with thermal capsulorrhaphy to form a combined treatment group (plication and thermal). Preoperative and postoperative glenohumeral volume measurements were obtained, and the techniques were statistically compared with a 1-factor analysis of variance. RESULTS: All 3 procedures produced marked decreases in glenohumeral capsular volume. Suture plication reduced intra-articular volume an average of 19.0%. Thermal capsulorrhaphy resulted in a mean capsular volume reduction of 33.4%. Combined treatment with suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy reduced glenohumeral volume an average of 41.0%. Both thermal capsulorrhaphy and the combined treatment produced significantly greater reduction in glenohumeral volume than plication alone (P <.0001). Although combined suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy resulted in greater reduction in capsular volume than thermal capsulorrhaphy alone, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that arthroscopic suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy are both effective in reducing glenohumeral intra-articular volume. Thermal capsulorrhaphy alone or in combination with suture plication led to significantly greater reduction in capsular volume when compared with isolated suture plication.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to objectively assess glenohumeral volume changes after arthroscopic suture plication, arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy, and combined suture and thermal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Cadaveric study. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver shoulders were treated with either thermal capsulorrhaphy (n = 5) or arthroscopic suture plication (n = 5). The shoulders treated with plication were then treated with thermal capsulorrhaphy to form a combined treatment group (plication and thermal). Preoperative and postoperative glenohumeral volume measurements were obtained, and the techniques were statistically compared with a 1-factor analysis of variance. RESULTS:All 3 procedures produced marked decreases in glenohumeral capsular volume. Suture plication reduced intra-articular volume an average of 19.0%. Thermal capsulorrhaphy resulted in a mean capsular volume reduction of 33.4%. Combined treatment with suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy reduced glenohumeral volume an average of 41.0%. Both thermal capsulorrhaphy and the combined treatment produced significantly greater reduction in glenohumeral volume than plication alone (P <.0001). Although combined suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy resulted in greater reduction in capsular volume than thermal capsulorrhaphy alone, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that arthroscopic suture plication and thermal capsulorrhaphy are both effective in reducing glenohumeral intra-articular volume. Thermal capsulorrhaphy alone or in combination with suture plication led to significantly greater reduction in capsular volume when compared with isolated suture plication.
Authors: Alison P Toth; Russell F Warren; Frank A Petrigliano; David A Doward; Frank A Cordasco; David W Altchek; Stephen J O'Brien Journal: HSS J Date: 2010-11-11
Authors: Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marta Ślęzak; Piotr Ogrodowicz; Jakub Stefaniak; Joanna Walecka; Leszek Romanowski Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 3.075