Literature DB >> 14760087

Detection of isolated tumor cells by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism for K-ras mutations in tissue samples of 199 colorectal cancer patients.

Christoph P Dieterle1, Michael Conzelmann, Ulrich Linnemann, Martin R Berger.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify K-ras mutations as marker for isolated tumor cells in liver, lymph node, and bone marrow specimens of colorectal cancer patients. To detect these, a PCR-RFLP assay was used with a sensitivity exceeding that of routine histopathology by at least 1 order of magnitude. In addition, the ratio of mutated versus wild-type alleles was determined by an internal standard. Of 199 patients, 74 (37.5%) were found to bear a K-ras-positive tumor. Of these, 60 (81%) were mutated in codon 12 and 14 (19%) in codon 13 (P < 0.001). In addition, 14 organs were found K-ras positive, 13 of which were from 12 patients with a K-ras-positive tumor (16%) and 1 from a patient with a K-ras-negative tumor (0.8%). Eight patients exhibited liver involvement and 6 showed lymph node involvement. Remarkably, no bone marrow specimen was found K-ras positive (P < 0.017 versus liver involvement). Sequence analysis of tumor DNA revealed that GGT (Gly) was replaced by GAT (Asp; 35%), GTT (Val; 32%), AGT (Ser; 13%), GCT (Ala; 10%), TGT (Cys; 8%), and CGT (Arg; 2%) for codon 12, and by GAC (Asp) as the only type of mutation for codon 13. In colorectal carcinomas the ratio of K-ras mutated versus wild-type alleles ranged over 4 orders of magnitude (10(0)-10(-4), median: 10(-2)) and was correlated with both, residual tumor load (R1/2; P = 0.028) and distant metastasis (M1; P = 0.057). These results show that detection of K-ras mutated alleles by PCR-RFLP in patients with colorectal carcinoma may aid in the identification of isolated tumor cells. High ratios of K-ras alleles were correlated with certain negative prognostic parameters (R,M). In accord with its function as a primary filter for colorectal carcinoma cells, the liver was more often contaminated with K-ras-positive cells than bone marrow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14760087     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1355-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

1.  Mutant KRAS Enhances Tumor Cell Fitness by Upregulating Stress Granules.

Authors:  Elda Grabocka; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  An orthotopic model of human osteosarcoma growth and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis.

Authors:  Hue H Luu; Quan Kang; Jong Kyung Park; Weike Si; Qing Luo; Wei Jiang; Hong Yin; Anthony G Montag; Michael A Simon; Terrance D Peabody; Rex C Haydon; Carrie W Rinker-Schaeffer; Tong-Chuan He
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  KRAS mutant tumor subpopulations can subvert durable responses to personalized cancer treatments.

Authors:  Barbara L Parsons; Meagan B Myers
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Molecular detection of clinical colorectal cancer metastasis: how should multiple markers be put to use?

Authors:  Michael Conzelmann; Ulrich Linnemann; Martin R Berger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  High-fidelity DNA polymerase enhances the sensitivity of a peptide nucleic acid clamp PCR assay for K-ras mutations.

Authors:  Bjørnar Gilje; Reino Heikkilä; Satu Oltedal; Kjersti Tjensvoll; Oddmund Nordgård
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Detection of rare mutant K-ras DNA in a single-tube reaction using peptide nucleic acid as both PCR clamp and sensor probe.

Authors:  Ji-Dung Luo; Err-Cheng Chan; Chun-Liang Shih; Tai-Long Chen; Ying Liang; Tsann-Long Hwang; Chiuan-Chian Chiou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Real-time bidirectional pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization for quantitative detection of somatic mutations.

Authors:  Najie Song; Xueting Zhong; Qingge Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Analysis of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational profile by combination of in-tube hybridization and universal tag-microarray in tumor tissue and plasma of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Francesco Damin; Silvia Galbiati; Nadia Soriani; Valentina Burgio; Monica Ronzoni; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcella Chiari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel Methodology for Rapid Detection of KRAS Mutation Using PNA-LNA Mediated Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification.

Authors:  Masahiro Itonaga; Ibu Matsuzaki; Kenji Warigaya; Takaaki Tamura; Yuki Shimizu; Masakazu Fujimoto; Fumiyoshi Kojima; Masao Ichinose; Shin-Ichi Murata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fixation and Spread of Somatic Mutations in Adult Human Colonic Epithelium.

Authors:  Anna M Nicholson; Cora Olpe; Alice Hoyle; Ann-Sofie Thorsen; Teja Rus; Mathilde Colombé; Roxanne Brunton-Sim; Richard Kemp; Kate Marks; Phil Quirke; Shalini Malhotra; Rogier Ten Hoopen; Ashraf Ibrahim; Cecilia Lindskog; Meagan B Myers; Barbara Parsons; Simon Tavaré; Mark Wilkinson; Edward Morrissey; Douglas J Winton
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 24.633

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.