Literature DB >> 14759694

Psychobiological mechanisms of socioeconomic differences in health.

M Kristenson1, H R Eriksen, J K Sluiter, D Starke, H Ursin.   

Abstract

The association between low socioeconomic status and poor health is well established. Empirical studies suggest that psychosocial factors are important mediators for these effects, and that the effects are mediated by psychobiological mechanisms related to stress physiology. The objective of this paper is to explore these psychobiological mechanisms. Psychobiological responses to environmental challenges depend on acquired expectancies (learning) of the relations between responses and stimuli. The stress response occurs whenever an individual is faced with a challenge. It is an essential element in the total adaptive system of the body, and necessary for adaptation, performance and survival. However, a period of recovery is necessary to rebalance and to manage new demands. Individuals with low social status report more environmental challenges and less psychosocial resources. This may lead to vicious circles of learning to expect negative outcomes, loss of coping ability, strain, hopelessness and chronic stress. This type of learning may interfere with the recovery processes, leading to sustained psychobiological activation and loss of dynamic capacity to respond to new challenges. Psychobiological responses and health effects in humans and animals depend on combinations of demands and expected outcomes (coping, control). In studies of humans with chronic psychosocial stress, and low SES, cortisol baseline levels were raised, and the cortisol response to acute stress attenuated. Low job control was associated with insufficient recovery of catecholamines and cortisol, and a range of negative health effects. Biological effects of choice of lifestyle, which also depends on the acquired outcome expectancies, reinforce these direct psychobiological effects on health. The paper concludes that sustained activation and loss of capacity to respond to a novel stressor could be a cause of the higher risk of illness and disease found among people with lower SES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759694     DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00353-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  83 in total

1.  Biomarkers of Psychological Stress in Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Chloe E Bird; Alice Furumoto-Dawson; Garth H Rauscher; Mack T Ruffin; Raymond P Stowe; Katherine L Tucker; Christopher M Masi
Journal:  Open Biomark J       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Effects of a brief worksite stress management program on coping skills, psychological distress and physical complaints: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Akihito Shimazu; Rino Umanodan; Wilmar B Schaufeli
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  The relations between psychosocial factors at work and health status among workers in home care organizations.

Authors:  Hege R Eriksen; Camilla Ihlebaek; Jeroen P Jansen; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

4.  Does the measure of economic disadvantage matter? Exploring the effect of individual and relative deprivation on intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Patricia B Reagan; Pamela J Salsberry; Randall J Olsen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Social inequalities in childhood dental caries: the convergent roles of stress, bacteria and disadvantage.

Authors:  W Thomas Boyce; Pamela K Den Besten; Juliet Stamperdahl; Ling Zhan; Yebin Jiang; Nancy E Adler; John D Featherstone
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Do biomarkers of stress mediate the relation between socioeconomic status and health?

Authors:  Jennifer B Dowd; Noreen Goldman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Offspring Socioeconomic Status and Parent Mortality Within a Historical Population.

Authors:  Zachary Zimmer; Heidi A Hanson; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2016-10

8.  Diurnal saliva cortisol levels and relations to psychosocial factors in a population sample of middle-aged Swedish men and women.

Authors:  Elaine Sjögren; Per Leanderson; Margareta Kristenson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

9.  To what extent do biomarkers account for the large social disparities in health in Moscow?

Authors:  Dana A Glei; Noreen Goldman; Vladimir M Shkolnikov; Dmitri Jdanov; Svetlana Shalnova; Maria Shkolnikova; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Socioeconomic status gradients in inflammation in adolescence.

Authors:  Stefanie A Pietras; Elizabeth Goodman
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.