Literature DB >> 14759649

Why is it advantageous for animals to detect celestial polarization in the ultraviolet? Skylight polarization under clouds and canopies is strongest in the UV.

András Barta1, Gábor Horváth.   

Abstract

The perception of skylight polarization in the ultraviolet (UV) by many insect species for orientation purposes is rather surprising, because both the degree of linear polarization and the radiance of light from the clear sky are considerably lower in the UV than in the blue or green. In this work we call this the "UV-sky-pol paradox". Although in the past, several attempts have been made to resolve this paradox, none of them was convincing. We present here a possible quantitative resolution to the paradox. We show by a model calculation that if the air layer between a cloud and a ground-based observer is partly sunlit, the degree of linear polarization p of skylight originating from the cloudy region is highest in the UV, because in this spectral range the unpolarized UV-deficient cloudlight dilutes least the polarized light scattered in the air beneath the cloud. Similarly, if the air under foliage is partly sunlit, p of downwelling light from the canopied region is maximal in the UV, because in this part of spectrum the unpolarized UV-deficient green canopylight dilutes least the polarized light scattered in the air beneath the canopy. Therefore, the detection of polarization of downwelling light under clouds or canopies is most advantageous in the UV, in which spectral range the risk is the smallest that the degree of polarization p is lower than the threshold p(tr) of polarization sensitivity in animals. On the other hand, under clear skies there is no favoured wavelength for perception of celestial polarization, because p of skylight is high enough (p > p(tr)) at all wavelengths. We show that there is an analogy between the detection of UV skylight polarization and the polarotactic water detection in the UV. However, insects perceive skylight polarization by UV or blue or green receptors. The question, why they differ in the spectral channel used for the detection of celestial polarization cannot be answered at the present time, because data are insufficient. Nevertheless, we present here one possible atmospheric optical reason why certain visual systems involved in detecting celestial polarization, are specifically tuned to the UV part of the spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759649     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  16 in total

Review 1.  Gold bugs and beyond: a review of iridescence and structural colour mechanisms in beetles (Coleoptera).

Authors:  Ainsley E Seago; Parrish Brady; Jean-Pol Vigneron; Tom D Schultz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Polarized skylight-based heading measurements: a bio-inspired approach.

Authors:  Julien Dupeyroux; Stéphane Viollet; Julien R Serres
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Empirical corroboration of an earlier theoretical resolution to the UV paradox of insect polarized skylight orientation.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Jun Gao; Zhiguo Fan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-01-09

4.  Physiological characterization of the compound eye in monarch butterflies with focus on the dorsal rim area.

Authors:  Julia Stalleicken; Thomas Labhart; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Anatomical and physiological evidence for polarisation vision in the nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis.

Authors:  Birgit Greiner; Thomas W Cronin; Willi A Ribi; William T Wcislo; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  Male attractiveness is influenced by UV wavelengths in a newt species but not in its close relative.

Authors:  Jean Secondi; Virginie Lepetz; Marc Théry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dedicated photoreceptor pathways in Drosophila larvae mediate navigation by processing either spatial or temporal cues.

Authors:  Tim-Henning Humberg; Pascal Bruegger; Bruno Afonso; Marta Zlatic; James W Truman; Marc Gershow; Aravinthan Samuel; Simon G Sprecher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Bio-inspired polarized skylight-based navigation sensors: a review.

Authors:  Salmah B Karman; S Zaleha M Diah; Ille C Gebeshuber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; John Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.528

10.  A functional role of the sky's polarization pattern for orientation in the greater mouse-eared bat.

Authors:  Stefan Greif; Ivailo Borissov; Yossi Yovel; Richard A Holland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.