Literature DB >> 14759379

Safety and tolerability of simvastatin plus niacin in patients with coronary artery disease and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (The HDL Atherosclerosis Treatment Study).

Xue-Qiao Zhao1, Josh S Morse, Alice A Dowdy, Nancy Heise, Debbie DeAngelis, Jiri Frohlich, Alan Chait, John J Albers, B Greg Brown.   

Abstract

The high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study showed that simvastatin plus niacin (mean daily dose 13 mg and 2.4 g, respectively) halt angiographic atherosclerosis progression and reduce major clinical events by 60% in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who have low HDL, in comparison with placebos, over 3 years. How safe and well-tolerated is this combination? One hundred sixty patients with CAD, including 25 with diabetes mellitus, with mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 128 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol of < or =35 mg/dl (mean 31), and mean triglycerides of 217 mg/dl were randomized to 4 factorial combinations of antioxidant vitamins or their placebos and simvastatin plus niacin or their placebos. Patients were examined monthly or bimonthly for 38 months; side effects (gastrointestinal upset, nausea, anorexia, vision, skin, and energy problems, or muscle aches) were directly queried and recorded. Aspartate aminotransferase, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), uric acid, homocysteine, and fasting glucose levels were regularly monitored. A safety monitor reviewed all side effects and adjusted drug dosages accordingly. Patients who received simvastatin plus niacin and those on placebo had similar frequencies of clinical or laboratory side effects: any degree of flushing (30% vs 23%, p = NS), symptoms of fatigue, nausea, and/or muscle aches (9% vs 5%, p = NS), aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) > or =3 times upper limit of normal (3% vs 1%, p = NS), CPK > or =2 times upper limit of normal (3% vs 4%, p = NS), CPK > or =5 times upper limit of normal, new onset of uric acid > or =7.5 mg/dl (18% vs 15%, p = NS), and homocysteine > or =15 micromol/L (9% vs 4%, p = NS). Glycemic control among diabetics declined mildly in the simvastatin-niacin group but returned to pretreatment levels at 8 months and remained stable for rest of the study. This combination regimen was repeatedly described by 91% of treated patients and 86% of placebo subjects as "very easy" or "fairly easy" to take. Thus, the simvastatin plus niacin regimen is effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with or without diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759379     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

1.  Strategies to achieve target LDL levels.

Authors:  Alan Chait
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement--recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ruth McPherson; Jiri Frohlich; George Fodor; Jacques Genest
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Rationale for combination therapy with statin drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ansell
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Niacin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Stefan Schandelmaier; Matthias Briel; Ramon Saccilotto; Kelechi K Olu; Armon Arpagaus; Lars G Hemkens; Alain J Nordmann
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Future of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors: a pharmacological perspective.

Authors:  Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour; Fatemeh Akhlaghi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Overcoming 'ageism' bias in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia : a review of safety issues with statins in the elderly.

Authors:  Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Niacin: another look at an underutilized lipid-lowering medication.

Authors:  Julia C Creider; Robert A Hegele; Tisha R Joy
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 8.  Niacin: the evidence, clinical use, and future directions.

Authors:  Todd C Villines; Andrew S Kim; Rosco S Gore; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Cardiovascular therapies and associated glucose homeostasis: implications across the dysglycemia continuum.

Authors:  Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Michael A Pacanowski; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Review of extended-release niacin/laropiprant fixed combination in the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia and primary hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Klaus G Parhofer
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.