Literature DB >> 14758859

The beryllium "double standard" standard.

David S Egilman1, Sarah Bagley, Molly Biklen, Alison Stern Golub, Susanna Rankin Bohme.   

Abstract

Brush Wellman, the world's leading producer and supplier of beryllium products, has systematically hidden cases of beryllium disease that occurred below the threshold limit value (TLV) and lied about the efficacy of the TLV in published papers, lectures, reports to government agencies, and instructional materials prepared for customers and workers. Hypocritically, Brush Wellman instituted a zero exposure standard for corporate executives while workers and customers were told the 2 microgram standard was "safe." Brush intentionally used its workers as "canaries for the plant," and referred to them as such. Internal documents and corporate depositions indicate that these actions were intentional and that the motive was money. Despite knowledge of the inadequacy of the TLV, Brush has successfully used it as a defense against lawsuits brought by injured workers and as a sales device to provide reassurance to customers. Brush's policy has reaped an untold number of victims and resulted in mass distribution of beryllium in consumer products. Such corporate malfeasance is perpetuated by the current market system, which is controlled by an organized oligopoly that creates an incentive for the neglect of worker health and safety in favor of externalizing costs to victimized workers, their families, and society at large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14758859     DOI: 10.2190/PL9P-XCE0-U8E2-RLMA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  5 in total

1.  Beryllium's public relations problem: protecting workers when there is no safe exposure level.

Authors:  David Michaels; Celeste Monforton
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Corporation-induced diseases, upstream epidemiologic surveillance, and urban health.

Authors:  René I Jahiel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Dust diseases and the legacy of corporate manipulation of science and law.

Authors:  David Egilman; Tess Bird; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-04

4.  Talc, Asbestos, and Epidemiology: Corporate Influence and Scientific Incognizance.

Authors:  Triet H Tran; Joan E Steffen; Kate M Clancy; Tess Bird; David S Egilman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  An Exploratory Study of Beryllium and UK Soft Touch Regulation: An Enduring Example of Weaknesses of UK Occupational Health and Safety Governance.

Authors:  Andrew Watterson; Matthias Beck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.