Literature DB >> 14758408

Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems.

Tikki Pang1, Ritu Sadana, Steve Hanney, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Adnan A Hyder, Jonathon Simon.   

Abstract

Health research generates knowledge that can be utilized to improve health system performance and, ultimately, health and health equity. We propose a conceptual framework for health research systems (HRSs) that defines their boundaries, components, goals, and functions. The framework adopts a systems perspective towards HRSs and serves as a foundation for constructing a practical approach to describe and analyse HRSs. The analysis of HRSs should, in turn, provide a better understanding of how research contributes to gains in health and health equity. In this framework, the intrinsic goals of the HRS are the advancement of scientific knowledge and the utilization of knowledge to improve health and health equity. Its four principal functions are stewardship, financing, creating and sustaining resources, and producing and using research. The framework, as it is applied in consultation with countries, will provide countries and donor agencies with relevant inputs to policies and strategies for strengthening HRSs and using knowledge for better health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14758408      PMCID: PMC2572351     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  90 in total

Review 1.  Importance of health research in South Asia.

Authors:  Ritu Sadana; Carol D'Souza; Adnan A Hyder; A Mushtaque R Chowdhury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-03

2.  Sustaining capacity in health policy and systems research in Thailand.

Authors:  Siriwan Pitayarangsarit; Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Assessing the state of health research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  S A Ismail; A McDonald; E Dubois; F G Aljohani; A P Coutts; A Majeed; S Rawaf
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Why history matters for quantitative target setting: Long-term trends in socioeconomic and racial/ethnic inequities in US infant death rates (1960-2010).

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Nakul Singh; Jarvis T Chen; Brent A Coull; Jason Beckfield; Mathew V Kiang; Pamela D Waterman; Sofia Gruskin
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Health research strengthening and operational research needs for improving child survival in India.

Authors:  Rajesh Khanna; Prasanna Hota; Chandrakant Lahariya
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Development of capacity for research ethics review in low- and middle-income countries: need for a systems approach.

Authors:  Vijayaprasad Gopichandran
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 7.  Evaluating quality of obstetric care in low-resource settings: building on the literature to design tailor-made evaluation instruments--an illustration in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Florence Morestin; Abel Bicaba; Jean de Dieu Sermé; Pierre Fournier
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Who needs what from a national health research system: lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system.

Authors:  Stephen Hanney; Shyama Kuruvilla; Bryony Soper; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-05-13

9.  Building capacity for evidence generation, synthesis and implementation to improve the care of mothers and babies in South East Asia: methods and design of the SEA-ORCHID Project using a logical framework approach.

Authors:  Steve McDonald; Tari Turner; Catherine Chamberlain; Pisake Lumbiganon; Jadsada Thinkhamrop; Mario R Festin; Jacqueline J Ho; Hakimi Mohammad; David J Henderson-Smart; Jacki Short; Caroline A Crowther; Ruth Martis; Sally Green
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  The translational research impact scale: development, construct validity, and reliability testing.

Authors:  Allard E Dembe; Michele S Lynch; P Cristian Gugiu; Rebecca D Jackson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.