Literature DB >> 14758307

Success rates of pediatric intubation by a non-physician-staffed critical care transport service.

Timothy H Harrison1, Stephen H Thomas, Suzanne K Wedel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous researchers have found that institution of an endotracheal intubation (ETI) protocol into a large urban paramedic program resulted in low success rates and had no beneficial effects. The primary goal of the current study was to assess ETI success rates achieved by a small cadre of nonphysician critical care transport (CCT) providers. A secondary objective was to assess for association between ETI success and factors such as age group or ETI setting (eg, in-hospital, in-aircraft).
DESIGN: This retrospective study analyzed transport records of consecutive pediatric patients (younger than 13 years) in whom ETI was attempted by a nurse/paramedic (RN/EMTP) CCT crew working under protocols which included neuromuscular blockade (NMB)-facilitated ETI. The CCT service performs scene and interfacility transports in helicopter, fixed-wing (airplane), and ground critical care vehicles; pediatric patients are transferred to 4 receiving tertiary care centers. Chi2 test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression analysis (P = 0.05) examined ETI success rates and assessed for association between ETI success and various characteristics (eg, age group, ETI setting).
RESULTS: The CCT crew attempted ETI in 143 patients, with success in 136 cases (95.1%). There were no unrecognized esophageal intubations. ETI success was of similar likelihood across pediatric age groups (P = 0.19) and in different ETI settings (P = 0.57).
CONCLUSIONS: CCT crew airway management success was very high in all practice settings. These data support contentions that, with a high level of initial and ongoing training, nonphysician CCT crew can successfully manage pediatric airways in a variety of circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14758307     DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000113879.10140.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  6 in total

1.  Helicopter EMS: Research Endpoints and Potential Benefits.

Authors:  Stephen H Thomas; Annette O Arthur
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.112

2.  Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial.

Authors:  Łukasz Szarpak; Łukasz Czyżewski; Andrzej Kurowski; Zenon Truszewski
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Nurses versus physician-led interhospital critical care transport: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Erik Jan van Lieshout; Jan Binnekade; Elmer Reussien; Dave Dongelmans; Nicole P Juffermans; Rob J de Haan; Marcus J Schultz; Margreeth B Vroom
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Meta-Analysis of Failure of Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Jhon Jairo Rodríguez; Luis Felipe Higuita-Gutiérrez; Edwar Arturo Carrillo Garcia; Esneider Castaño Betancur; Mauricio Luna Londoño; Sara Restrepo Vargas
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 1.112

5.  Success and complications by team composition for prehospital paediatric intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan A Garner; Nicholas Bennett; Andrew Weatherall; Anna Lee
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Pediatric interfacility transport effects on mortality and length of stay.

Authors:  Rod M Shinozaki; Andreas Schwingshackl; Neeraj Srivastava; Tristan Grogan; Robert B Kelly
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.764

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.