Literature DB >> 14758241

Tumescent and dry liposuction of lower extremities: differences in lymph vessel injury.

Johannes N Hoffmann1, Jan P Fertmann, Rüdiger G H Baumeister, Reinhard Putz, Andreas Frick.   

Abstract

Lipectomy is a standard procedure in plastic surgery. Until now, however, there was no definite information about the influence of different liposuction techniques (tumescent versus dry liposuction) on the integrity of lymph collectors during this procedure. To study the effect of these liposuction techniques on the incidence of lymph vessel injury, postmortem lymphatic preparations were done in nine human cadavers (18 lower extremities). Conventional liposuction with a blunt 4-mm cannula in the dry technique (n = 29 regions) was compared with the tumescent technique (n = 26). Liposuction was performed in parallel to the superficial lymph vessels (longitudinal suction) or transversally in an 80-degree to 90-degree angle to the extremity (vertical suction). Careful surgical preparation of different regions followed. A specific macroscopic lymph vessel injury score was applied to differentiate three degrees of lymph vessel lesions according to the extravasation of patent blue. In all lower extremities, postmortem lymph flow occurred as indicated by patent blue staining of the lymph vessels. Injection of fluid that is obligatory during tumescent suction did not result in grade 2 injury. On the contrary, tumescent suction overall produced significantly fewer lymph vessel lesions when compared with the dry technique (p < 0.05). Longitudinal liposuction produced significantly less injury when compared with vertical suction (p < 0.05). Tumescent suction and dry suction were equally effective in removing adipose aspirates, as verified by circumference measurements. In addition, tumescent liposuction is unlikely to cause major lesions of epifascial lymph vessels during suction procedures vertical to the extremity axis. Therefore, in this respect, this technique is superior to dry suction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14758241     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000101506.84361.C9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  A Case Series of Lymphatic Injuries After Suction Lipectomy in Women with Lipedema.

Authors:  Thomas F Wright; Karen L Herbst
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-11

2.  Liposuction Gives Complete Reduction of Arm Lymphedema following Breast Cancer Treatment-A 5-year Prospective Study in 105 Patients without Recurrence.

Authors:  Mattias Hoffner; Karin Ohlin; Barbro Svensson; Jonas Manjer; Emma Hansson; Thomas Troëng; Håkan Brorson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-16

3.  Multimodality Approach to Lymphedema Surgery Achieves and Maintains Normal Limb Volumes: A Treatment Algorithm to Optimize Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Deptula; Anna Zhou; Victoria Posternak; Hui He; Dung Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  MR lymphography of lymphatic vessels in lower extremity with gynecologic oncology-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Zachary Delproposto; Alice Hu; Christine Tran; Ningfei Liu; Yulai Li; Jianrong Xu; Duy Bui; Jiani Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Liposuction in the Treatment of Lipedema: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Mehran Dadras; Peter Joachim Mallinger; Cord Christian Corterier; Sotiria Theodosiadi; Mojtaba Ghods
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2017-07-15

6.  Does tumescent liposuction damage the lymph vessels in lipoedema patients?

Authors:  Chantalle B van de Pas; Robert Sm Boonen; Shaula Stevens; Sten Willemsen; Roelf Valkema; Martino Neumann
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.740

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.