Literature DB >> 14757794

Defining and classifying medical error: lessons for patient safety reporting systems.

M Tamuz1, E J Thomas, K E Franchois.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important for healthcare providers to report safety related events, but little attention has been paid to how the definition and classification of events affects a hospital's ability to learn from its experience.
OBJECTIVES: To examine how the definition and classification of safety related events influences key organizational routines for gathering information, allocating incentives, and analyzing event reporting data.
METHODS: In semi-structured interviews, professional staff and administrators in a tertiary care teaching hospital and its pharmacy were asked to describe the existing programs designed to monitor medication safety, including the reporting systems. With a focus primarily on the pharmacy staff, interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative research methods.
RESULTS: Eighty six interviews were conducted, including 36 in the hospital pharmacy. Examples are presented which show that: (1) the definition of an event could lead to under-reporting; (2) the classification of a medication error into alternative categories can influence the perceived incentives and disincentives for incident reporting; (3) event classification can enhance or impede organizational routines for data analysis and learning; and (4) routines that promote organizational learning within the pharmacy can reduce the flow of medication error data to the hospital. DISCUSSION: These findings from one hospital raise important practical and research questions about how reporting systems are influenced by the definition and classification of safety related events. By understanding more clearly how hospitals define and classify their experience, we may improve our capacity to learn and ultimately improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14757794      PMCID: PMC1758057          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  7 in total

1.  Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study.

Authors:  C Vincent; N Stanhope; M Crowley-Murphy
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 2.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems.

Authors:  P Barach; S D Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

3.  Some hopes and concerns regarding medical event-reporting systems: lessons from the NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System.

Authors:  C E Billings
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  What is an error?

Authors:  T P Hofer; E A Kerr; R A Hayward
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

5.  Rules outside the rules for administration of medication: a study in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  H M Baker
Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch       Date:  1997

6.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado.

Authors:  E J Thomas; D M Studdert; H R Burstin; E J Orav; T Zeena; E J Williams; K M Howard; P C Weiler; T A Brennan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement.

Authors:  D J Cullen; D W Bates; S D Small; J B Cooper; A R Nemeskal; L L Leape
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1995-10
  7 in total
  17 in total

1.  Data consistency in a voluntary medical incident reporting system.

Authors:  Yang Gong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Persistence of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room.

Authors:  S Espin; L Lingard; G R Baker; G Regehr
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

3.  Computer based medication error reporting: insights and implications.

Authors:  M R Miller; J S Clark; C U Lehmann
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

4.  Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology.

Authors:  M Husch; C Sullivan; D Rooney; C Barnard; M Fotis; J Clarke; G Noskin
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-04

Review 5.  Improving patient safety in hospitals: Contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory.

Authors:  Michal Tamuz; Michael I Harrison
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Development of a measure of patient safety event learning responses.

Authors:  Liane R Ginsburg; You-Ta Chuang; Peter G Norton; Whitney Berta; Deborah Tregunno; Peggy Ng; Julia Richardson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Leveraging user's performance in reporting patient safety events by utilizing text prediction in narrative data entry.

Authors:  Yang Gong; Lei Hua; Shen Wang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Understanding the limitations of incident reporting in medication errors.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; Jake Abernathy; David Neyens; Kathleen Sutcliffe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Exploring the relationship between safety culture and reported dispensing errors in a large sample of Swedish community pharmacies.

Authors:  Annika Nordén-Hägg; Sofia Kälvemark-Sporrong; Åsa Kettis Lindblad
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  Implementing a 48 h EWTD-compliant rota for junior doctors in the UK does not compromise patients' safety: assessor-blind pilot comparison.

Authors:  F P Cappuccio; A Bakewell; F M Taggart; G Ward; C Ji; J P Sullivan; M Edmunds; R Pounder; C P Landrigan; S W Lockley; E Peile
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2009-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.