Literature DB >> 14757642

Math1 controls cerebellar granule cell differentiation by regulating multiple components of the Notch signaling pathway.

Roi Gazit1, Valery Krizhanovsky, Nissim Ben-Arie.   

Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells (CGC) are the most abundant neurons in the mammalian brain, and an important tool for unraveling molecular mechanisms underlying neurogenesis. Math1 is a bHLH transcription activator that is essential for the genesis of CGC. To delineate the effects of Math1 on CGC differentiation, we generated and studied primary cultures of CGC progenitors from Math1/lacZ knockout mice. Rhombic lip precursors appeared properly positioned, expressed CGC-specific markers, and maintained Math1 promoter activity in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that Math1 is not essential for the initial stages of specification or survival of CGC. Moreover, the continuous activity of Math1 promoter in the absence of MATH1, indicated that MATH1 was not necessary for the activation of its own expression. After 6, but not 3, days in culture, Math1 promoter activity was downregulated in control cultures, but not in cells from Math1 null mice, thus implying that Math1 participates in a negative regulatory feedback loop that is dependent on increased levels of MATH1 generated through the positive autoregulatory feedback loop. In addition, Math1 null CGC did not differentiate properly in culture, and were unable to extend processes. All Notch signaling pathway receptors and ligands tested were expressed in the rhombic lip at embryonic date 14, with highest levels of Notch2 and Jag1. However, Math1-null rhombic lip cells presented conspicuous downregulation of Notch4 and Dll1. Moreover, of the two transcriptional repressors known to antagonize Math1, Hes5 (but not Hes1) was downregulated in Math1-null rhombic lip tissue and primary cultures, and was shown to bind MATH1, thus revealing a negative regulatory feedback loop. Taken together, our data demonstrate that CGC differentiation, but not specification, depends on Math1, which acts by regulating the level of multiple components of the Notch signaling pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14757642     DOI: 10.1242/dev.00982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  37 in total

1.  Cerebellar GABAergic progenitors adopt an external granule cell-like phenotype in the absence of Ptf1a transcription factor expression.

Authors:  Marta Pascual; Ibane Abasolo; Ana Mingorance-Le Meur; Albert Martínez; José A Del Rio; Christopher V E Wright; Francisco X Real; Eduardo Soriano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nuclear factor I coordinates multiple phases of cerebellar granule cell development via regulation of cell adhesion molecules.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Debra Mullikin-Kilpatrick; James E Crandall; Richard M Gronostajski; E David Litwack; Daniel L Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Genetic analyses demonstrate that bone morphogenetic protein signaling is required for embryonic cerebellar development.

Authors:  Lihua Qin; Lara Wine-Lee; Kyung J Ahn; E Bryan Crenshaw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  LIM-homeodomain proteins Lhx1 and Lhx5, and their cofactor Ldb1, control Purkinje cell differentiation in the developing cerebellum.

Authors:  Yangu Zhao; Kin-Ming Kwan; Christina M Mailloux; Woon-Kyu Lee; Alexander Grinberg; Wolfgang Wurst; Richard R Behringer; Heiner Westphal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  BMPs oppose Math1 in cerebellar development and in medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Matthew R Grimmer; William A Weiss
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  MicroRNA expression profile in murine central nervous system development.

Authors:  Danyella B Dogini; Patrícia A O Ribeiro; Cristiane Rocha; Tiago C Pereira; Iscia Lopes-Cendes
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.444

7.  Nonviral Reprogramming of Human Wharton's Jelly Cells Reveals Differences Between ATOH1 Homologues.

Authors:  Adam J Mellott; Keerthana Devarajan; Heather E Shinogle; David S Moore; Zsolt Talata; Jennifer S Laurence; M Laird Forrest; Sumihare Noji; Eiji Tanaka; Hinrich Staecker; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Multiple zebrafish atoh1 genes specify a diversity of neuronal types in the zebrafish cerebellum.

Authors:  Chelsea U Kidwell; Chen-Ying Su; Masahiko Hibi; Cecilia B Moens
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Stox1 as a novel transcriptional suppressor of Math1 during cerebellar granule neurogenesis and medulloblastoma formation.

Authors:  Chenlu Zhang; Zhongzhong Ji; Minglei Wang; Weiwei Zhang; Rong Yang; Huanping An; Ru Yang; Daan van Abel; Marie van Dijk; Xiaohang Yang; Guangshuo Ou; Helen He Zhu; Wei-Qiang Gao
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  Defects in the cerebella of conditional Neurod1 null mice correlate with effective Tg(Atoh1-cre) recombination and granule cell requirements for Neurod1 for differentiation.

Authors:  Ning Pan; Israt Jahan; Jacqueline E Lee; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.