Literature DB >> 14757588

Acquiring and inhibiting prepotent responses in schizophrenia: event-related brain potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Judith M Ford1, Max Gray, Susan L Whitfield, And U Turken, Gary Glover, William O Faustman, Daniel H Mathalon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is associated with deficits in using context to establish prepotent responses in complex paradigms and failures to inhibit prepotent responses once established.
OBJECTIVE: To assess prepotent response establishment and inhibition in patients with schizophrenia using event-related brain potential (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a simple NoGo task. To combine fMRI and ERP data to focus on fMRI activations associated with the brief (approximately 200 ms) moment of context updating reflected in the NoGo P300 ERP component. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We collected ERP and fMRI data while subjects performed a NoGo task requiring a speedy button press to X stimuli (P=.88) but not to K stimuli (P=.12). The ERPs were collected at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif; fMRIs were collected at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (n=11) from the community and the VA hospital and sex- and age-matched healthy control subjects (n=11) from the community. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behavioral accuracy, P300 amplitudes and latencies, and fMRI activations suggested that patients with schizophrenia did not establish as strong a prepotent tendency to respond to the Go stimulus as healthy subjects. In healthy subjects, NoGo P300 was related to activations in the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, and right inferior parietal lobule and caudate nucleus, perhaps reflecting conflict experienced when withholding a response, control needed to inhibit a response, and stopping a response in action, respectively. In patients with schizophrenia, NoGo P300 was modestly related to activations in the anterior cingulate cortex, which is consistent with experiencing conflict.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference in ERP and fMRI responses to Go and NoGo stimuli suggested that inhibiting a response was easier for patients with schizophrenia than for healthy subjects. Correlations of P300 and fMRI data suggested that patients with schizophrenia and healthy subjects used different neural structures to inhibit responses, with healthy subjects using a more complex system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14757588     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  42 in total

1.  Severe cross-modal object recognition deficits in rats treated sub-chronically with NMDA receptor antagonists are reversed by systemic nicotine: implications for abnormal multisensory integration in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Derek L Jacklin; Amit Goel; Kyle J Clementino; Alexander W M Hall; John C Talpos; Boyer D Winters
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Anticipating the future: automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Inhibiting prepotent responses in the elderly: Distraction and disinhibition.

Authors:  Shulan Hsieh; Mengyao Wu; Chien-Hui Tang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  A supramodal limbic-paralimbic-neocortical network supports goal-directed stimulus processing.

Authors:  Kristin R Laurens; Kent A Kiehl; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Advances in psychometric tests for screening minimal hepatic encephalopathy: From paper-and-pencil to computer-aided assessment.

Authors:  Ming Luo; Ping Ma; Lei Li; Wu-Kui Cao
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Genetic modulation of GABA levels in the anterior cingulate cortex by GAD1 and COMT.

Authors:  Stefano Marenco; Antonina A Savostyanova; Jan Willem van der Veen; Matthew Geramita; Alexa Stern; Alan S Barnett; Bhaskar Kolachana; Eugenia Radulescu; Fengyu Zhang; Joseph H Callicott; Richard E Straub; Jun Shen; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-08-15

8.  Imaging frontostriatal function in ultra-high-risk, early, and chronic schizophrenia during executive processing.

Authors:  Rajendra A Morey; Seniha Inan; Teresa V Mitchell; Diana O Perkins; Jeffrey A Lieberman; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03

Review 9.  Multimodal Brain and Behavior Indices of Psychosis Risk.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2016

10.  Genetic variation in neuregulin1 is associated with differences in prefrontal engagement in children.

Authors:  Andrea Mechelli; Essi Viding; William Pettersson-Yeo; Stefania Tognin; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.