Literature DB >> 14757470

Transfer of vitrified blastocysts from one or two superovulated Large White Hyperprolific donors to Meishan recipients: reproductive parameters at Day 30 of pregnancy.

Cristina Cuello1, Françoise Berthelot, Françoise Martinat-Botté, Philippe Guillouet, Vincent Furstoss, Christian Boisseau, Patrick Manceau, Alain Locatelli, Emilio A Martínez.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to determine the effect of pooling embryos from two donors on the reproductive success of transfer of vitrified/warmed porcine blastocysts. Intact blastocysts were collected from superovulated Large White Hyperprolific gilts (n = 24) on Days 5-5.5 after artificial insemination. Embryos were recovered by flushing the uterine horns, and unhatched blastocysts were selected. Vitrification and warming were performed as described by Berthelot et al. [Cryobiology 41(2000) 116]. To evaluate in vitro development, 37 vitrified/warmed blastocysts were cultured, non-vitrified embryos (n = 48) were used as controls. Embryo transfers were conducted in asynchronous (-24 h) Meishan gilts (n = 20). Twenty vitrified/warmed blastocysts were surgically transferred into one uterine horn. Ten recipients received embryos from one donor (Group 1) and the other 10 transfers were performed with mixed embryos from two donors (Group 2). Pregnancy was assessed ultrasonographically at Day 25 after estrus and recipients were slaughtered at Day 30 after transfer. In vitro survival rate of the vitrified/warmed blastocysts was lower (P < 0.01) than that from control embryos (73.0% versus 93.7%). The pregnancy rate for Group 1 (70%) was not different (P > 0.05) than that from Group 2 (90%). No significant differences were detected between Groups 1 and 2 for in vivo embryo development (number fetuses/transferred embryos in pregnant recipients) or in vivo embryo survival (number viable fetuses/transferred embryos in pregnant recipients). However, the in vivo efficiency (number viable fetuses/total transferred embryos) was higher (P < 0.05) when transfers were performed with embryos from two donors (19.5% versus 30.5%). These results indicate that pooling embryos from two donors increases the in vivo efficiency after transfer of vitrified/warmed porcine blastocysts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14757470     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00257-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

Review 1.  Emerging applications of sperm, embryo and somatic cell cryopreservation in maintenance, relocation and rederivation of swine genetics.

Authors:  H Men; E M Walters; H Nagashima; R S Prather
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Birth of piglets from in vitro-produced, zona-intact porcine embryos vitrified in a closed system.

Authors:  H Men; C Zhao; W Si; C N Murphy; L Spate; Y Liu; E M Walters; M S Samuel; R S Prather; J K Critser
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Nonsurgical deep uterine transfer of vitrified, in vivo-derived, porcine embryos is as effective as the default surgical approach.

Authors:  Emilio A Martinez; Cristina A Martinez; Alicia Nohalez; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Juan M Vazquez; Jordi Roca; Inmaculada Parrilla; Maria A Gil; Cristina Cuello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Successful non-surgical deep uterine transfer of porcine morulae after 24 hour culture in a chemically defined medium.

Authors:  Emilio A Martinez; Miguel Angel Angel; Cristina Cuello; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Jesus Gomis; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jordi Vila; Ignaci Colina; Marta Diaz; Josep Reixach; Jose Luis Vazquez; Juan Maria Vazquez; Jordi Roca; Maria Antonia Gil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identification of variables contributing to superovulation efficiency for production of transgenic prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

Authors:  Alaine C Keebaugh; Meera E Modi; Catherine E Barrett; Chengliu Jin; Larry J Young
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Zygote arrest 1 gene in pig, cattle and human: evidence of different transcript variants in male and female germ cells.

Authors:  Svetlana Uzbekova; Monica Roy-Sabau; Rozenn Dalbiès-Tran; Christine Perreau; Pascal Papillier; Florence Mompart; Aurore Thelie; Sophie Pennetier; Juliette Cognie; Veronique Cadoret; Dominique Royere; Philippe Monget; Pascal Mermillod
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  An earlier uterine environment favors the in vivo development of fresh pig morulae and blastocysts transferred by a nonsurgical deep-uterine method.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Angel; Maria Antonia Gil; Cristina Cuello; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Jesus Gomis; Inmaculada Parrilla; Jordi Vila; Ignacio Colina; Marta Diaz; Josep Reixach; Jose Luis Vazquez; Juan Maria Vazquez; Jordi Roca; Emilio A Martinez
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.