Literature DB >> 14756602

Coping and anxiety in women recalled for additional diagnostic procedures following an abnormal screening mammogram.

Bernadette Davantes Heckman1, Edwin B Fisher, Barbara Monsees, Michael Merbaum, Stephen Ristvedt, Connie Bishop.   

Abstract

This study characterized women's concurrent and subsequent levels of emotional distress associated with a questionable mammogram screening and relationships between women's coping and psychosocial adjustment. State anxiety was assessed in 98 women 1 day after receiving a mammogram screening (Time 1), after notification of a questionable screening result that necessitated additional testing (Time 2), and after being informed of their breast-cancer-free status (Time 3). Key findings include (a) women reported a significant increase in anxiety following notification of the need to return for follow-up testing; (b) significant and positive associations were found between anxiety and behavioral approach, behavioral avoidance, cognitive approach, and cognitive avoidance coping in cross-sectional analyses; and (c) cognitive avoidance coping was a strong predictor of final levels of state anxiety in women. Findings suggest that cognitive avoidance coping plays an important role in reducing anxiety in women recalled to clarify an initially ambiguous screening procedure. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14756602     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  13 in total

1.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  How Many of the Biopsy Decisions Taken at Inexperienced Breast Radiology Units Were Correct?

Authors:  Özlem Demircioğlu; Meral Uluer; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  The Role of the Self in Smoking Initiation and Smoking Cessation: A Review and Blueprint for Research at the Intersection of Social-Cognition and Health.

Authors:  William G Shadel; Daniel Cervone
Journal:  Self Identity       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Psychological distress associated with cancer screening: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Chad-Friedman; Sarah Coleman; Lara N Traeger; William F Pirl; Roberta Goldman; Steven J Atlas; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-02-19

6.  Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Long H Ngo; Robyn L Birdwell; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Jessica Donato; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Strategies used in coping with a cancer diagnosis predict meaning in life for survivors.

Authors:  Heather S Jim; Susan A Richardson; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Impact of patient navigation on cancer diagnostic resolution among Northwest Tribal communities.

Authors:  Victoria Warren-Mears; Jenine Dankovchik; Meena Patil; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Ping-Hsin Chen; Steve Kim
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 10.  Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; William E Barlow; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Mitchell D Schnall; Katrina Armstrong; Marilyn M Schapira; Berta Geller; Donald L Weaver; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.