Literature DB >> 14756461

Clinical efficacy of microencapsulated timothy grass pollen extract in grass-allergic individuals.

Elizabeth C TePas1, Elisabeth G Hoyte, Jennifer J McIntire, Dale T Umetsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional allergen immunotherapy is clinically effective in reducing the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma. It differs from other pharmacotherapies in that it can induce long-term clinical remission of these diseases. However, it requires years of treatment and is associated with serious allergic reactions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and immunologic mechanisms of immunotherapy with an oral, microencapsulated form of timothy grass allergen.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients aged 19 to 55 years with grass pollen allergy were randomized to receive either microencapsulated timothy grass pollen extract or placebo once a day for 10 weeks. The dose of study drug was doubled weekly. Safety was evaluated through weekly visits, daily symptom diaries, and routine laboratory tests. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing medication use and symptoms scores during peak grass pollen season before and after treatment. Allergen-specific T-cell responses, cytokine production, and IgG, IgE, and skin reactivity were measured to evaluate immunologic mechanisms.
RESULTS: Eleven of 12 patients in the active treatment group had a decrease in the combined medication and symptom score, but only 4 of 10 patients in the placebo group had a decrease in scores. The proliferative response to timothy grass was reduced by at least 30% in 9 of the 12 grass-treated patients, but only 3 of 11 placebo patients had a proliferative response reduction. Timothy grass-induced interleukin-5 messenger RNA was reduced in the active group, but not in the placebo group. There were no significant changes in either group in IgG, IgE, and skin reactivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral immunotherapy with microencapsulated allergen induces a form of immunologic tolerance to the allergen and is a safe, efficient, and effective method of allergen immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14756461     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61706-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  6 in total

Review 1.  Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  M A Calderon; B Alves; M Jacobson; B Hurwitz; A Sheikh; S Durham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 2.  Latest developments in the management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Alvin M Sanico
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Epigenetic modifications and improved regulatory T-cell function in subjects undergoing dual sublingual immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ravi S Swamy; Neha Reshamwala; Tessa Hunter; Soujanya Vissamsetti; Carah B Santos; Fuad M Baroody; Peter H Hwang; Elisabeth G Hoyte; Marco A Garcia; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.

Authors:  Rebecca Normansell; Kayleigh M Kew; Amy-Louise Bridgman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Sublingual immunotherapy for asthma.

Authors:  Rebecca Fortescue; Kayleigh M Kew; Marco Shiu Tsun Leung
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-14

Review 6.  The dichotomy of pathogens and allergens in vaccination approaches.

Authors:  Fiona J Baird; Andreas L Lopata
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.