Literature DB >> 14756390

Adaptive learning in arthropods: spider mites learn to distinguish food quality.

Martijn Egas1, Derk-Jaap Norde, Maurice W Sabelis.   

Abstract

Many herbivorous arthropods have been shown to possess learning capabilities, yet fitness effects of learning are largely unknown. In this paper, we test whether two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae) learn to distinguish food quality in choice tests, and whether this results in fitness benefits. Food consisted of cucumber plants with one of three degrees of feeding damage: undamaged (no mites), mildly damaged (infested by a mite strain adapted to tomato) and heavily damaged (infested by a mite strain adapted to cucumber). Mites were subjected to one choice test in a greenhouse and three sequential choice tests on leaf disks. Thereafter, individual mite performance was measured as oviposition rate over four days. In the course of the three small-scale choice tests, preference shifted towards less damaged food. The performance tests showed that learning was adaptive: mites learned to prefer the food type that yielded the higher oviposition rate. Interestingly, innate preferences in the greenhouse tests were close to those shown after learning in the small-scale tests. Given that both strains of mites had not experienced cucumber for several years, we hypothesize that the preference in the greenhouse was due to avoidance of mite odours rather than odours of damaged plants. Through its effect on foraging behaviour, adaptive learning may promote the evolution of host plant specialization in herbivorous arthropods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14756390     DOI: 10.1023/b:appa.0000006512.26242.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  11 in total

1.  Appetitive learning of odours with different behavioural meaning in moths.

Authors:  E Hartlieb; P Anderson; B S Hansson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999-11

2.  Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers.

Authors:  R Dukas; E A Bernays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Olfactory-based discrimination learning in the moth, Manduca sexta.

Authors:  K C Daly; M L Durtschi; B H Smith
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Intraspecific variation in induction of feeding preference and performance in a herbivorous mite.

Authors:  Wojciech Magowski; Martijn Egas; Jan Bruin; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Induction of preference and performance after acclimation to novel hosts in a phytophagous spider mite: adaptive plasticity?

Authors:  Anurag A Agrawal; Filipa Vala; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Phytochemical basis of learning inRhagoletis pomonella and other herbivorous insects.

Authors:  D R Papaj; R J Prokopy
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  ON THE MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC VARIATION BY DISRUPTIVE SELECTION AMONG HOSTS IN A PHYTOPHAGOUS MITE.

Authors:  James D Fry
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  When learning guides evolution.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Oct 29-Nov 4       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Odour-mediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors.

Authors:  A Pallini; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Behavioural analysis of olfactory conditioning in the moth spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: noctuidae)

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  6 in total

1.  Learning in herbivorous insects: dispersing aphids spend less time evaluating familiar than novel non-host plant species.

Authors:  Lauren Mathews
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Differential timing of spider mite-induced direct and indirect defenses in tomato plants.

Authors:  Merijn R Kant; Kai Ament; Maurice W Sabelis; Michel A Haring; Robert C Schuurink
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Is the cereal rust mite, Abacarus hystrix really a generalist? - Testing colonization performance on novel hosts.

Authors:  Anna Skoracka; Lechosław Kuczyński
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  The PP2C-type phosphatase AP2C1, which negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6, modulates innate immunity, jasmonic acid, and ethylene levels in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Alois Schweighofer; Vaiva Kazanaviciute; Elisabeth Scheikl; Markus Teige; Robert Doczi; Heribert Hirt; Manfred Schwanninger; Merijn Kant; Robert Schuurink; Felix Mauch; Antony Buchala; Francesca Cardinale; Irute Meskiene
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Intraspecific variation in a generalist herbivore accounts for differential induction and impact of host plant defences.

Authors:  Merijn R Kant; Maurice W Sabelis; Michel A Haring; Robert C Schuurink
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Age-dependent male mating tactics in a spider mite-A life-history perspective.

Authors:  Yukie Sato; Peter T Rühr; Helmut Schmitz; Martijn Egas; Alexander Blanke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.