Literature DB >> 14756366

Evaluation of decision criteria for detection of spinal cord compression based on cervical myelography in horses: 38 cases (1981-2001).

J van Biervliet1, P V Scrivani, T J Divers, H N Erb, A de Lahunta, A Nixon.   

Abstract

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Different criteria have been described based on height reduction of the total myelographic contrast column and components of it as tests for compression of the spinal cord due to cervical stenotic myelopathy (CSM). Fifty percent height reduction of the dorsal myelographic column (DMC), <2 mm empiric height of the DMC and a 40% reduction of the ratio of stenosis calculated based on the height reduction of the entire dural diameter (DD) have been described as decision criteria for considering the test result positive. The reasons for selecting these decision criteria or their accuracies have rarely been reported.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic criteria based on reduced height of the total myelographic column and components of it for diagnosing extradural spinal cord compression using different decision criteria, and make recommendations for consistent myelographic interpretation in horses suspected of having CSM.
METHODS: Four measurements were obtained by 2 readers in a retrospective sample population of 38 horses in which both cervical myelography and histopathological examination of the cervical spinal cord were performed. The prevalence of CSM in the sample was 50%. At intervertebral sites, the minimum heights of the DD and DMC were measured. At intravertebral sites, the maximum heights of the entire DD and DMC were obtained. Percent height reductions of the DMC and DD were determined as the ratio of minimum intervertebral height to maximum intravertebral height within the next cranial vertebra. Histological examination was used as the gold standard for determining the actual site of spinal cord compression. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnostic criteria were estimated at each site in neutral and flexed neck positions using several different decision criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: At C6-C7, in neutral or flexed neck position and using 20% reduction of DD, the test was highly sensitive and specific for CSM. At other sites, reduced height of the myelographic column generally was not accurate for diagnosing extradural spinal cord compression. Using 20% reduction of DD in neutral position at the mid-cervical sites, the test had only low sensitivity and high specificity. Flexion of the neck appeared to increase detection of spinal cord compression in the mid-cervical region, but also substantially increased the frequency of false-positive diagnoses. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: By using the reported sensitivity and specificity estimates, readers may decide on a decision criterion for diagnosis of extradural spinal cord compression due to CSM. However, in planning a surgical correction, it is difficult to define a decision criterion that combines acceptable sensitivity and specificity, especially at the mid-cervical sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14756366     DOI: 10.2746/0425164044864642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  12 in total

1.  Tri-level surgical treatment of cervical spinal cord compression in a Thoroughbred yearling.

Authors:  Nick Huggons
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Atlanto-axial approach for cervical myelography in a Thoroughbred horse with complete fusion of the atlanto-occipital bones.

Authors:  Monica Aleman; Abigail N Dimock; Erik R Wisner; Jamie W Prutton; John E Madigan
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Current dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter reduction rules do not apply at the cervicothoracic junction in horses.

Authors:  Krista Estell; Mathieu Spriet; Kathryn L Phillips; Monica Aleman; Carrie J Finno
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.363

4.  An objective index for spinal cord compression on computed tomography in Thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  Taro Kondo; Fumio Sato; Nao Tsuzuki; Chun-Jen Chen; Kazutaka Yamada
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-13

5.  Rater agreement on gait assessment during neurologic examination of horses.

Authors:  E Olsen; B Dunkel; W H J Barker; E J T Finding; J D Perkins; T H Witte; L J Yates; P H Andersen; K Baiker; R J Piercy
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Comparison of the clinical and radiographic appearance of the cervical vertebrae with histological and anatomical findings in an eight-month old warmblood stallion suffering from cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy (CVSM).

Authors:  Magdalena Szklarz; Anna Lipinska; Malwina Slowikowska; Artur Niedzwiedz; Krzysztof Marycz; Maciej Janeczek
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Accuracy of transcranial magnetic stimulation and a Bayesian latent class model for diagnosis of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Els Raes; Sebastien Buczinski; Michèle Dumoulin; Piet Deprez; Luc Van Ham; Gunther van Loon; Bart Pardon
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Equine cervical intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with location and MRI features.

Authors:  Stefanie Veraa; Wilhelmina Bergmann; Inge D Wijnberg; Willem Back; Hans Vernooij; Mirjam Nielen; Antoon-Jan M van den Belt
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 1.363

9.  Magnetic motor evoked potentials of cervical muscles in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Bart Pardon; Luc Van Ham; Philip Joosten; Gunther van Loon; Piet Deprez
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Determination of magnetic motor evoked potential latency time cutoff values for detection of spinal cord dysfunction in horses.

Authors:  Joke Rijckaert; Bart Pardon; Veronique Saey; Els Raes; Luc Van Ham; Richard Ducatelle; Gunther van Loon; Piet Deprez
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.