Literature DB >> 14754292

Bivariate surrogate techniques: necessity, strengths, and caveats.

Ralph G Andrzejak1, Alexander Kraskov, Harald Stögbauer, Florian Mormann, Thomas Kreuz.   

Abstract

The concept of surrogates allows testing results from time series analysis against specified null hypotheses. In application to bivariate model dynamics we here compare different types of surrogates, each designed to test against a different null hypothesis, e.g., an underlying bivariate linear stochastic process. Two measures that aim at a characterization of interdependence between nonlinear deterministic dynamics were used as discriminating statistics. We analyze eight different stochastic and deterministic models not only to demonstrate the power of the surrogates, but also to reveal some pitfalls and limitations.

Year:  2003        PMID: 14754292     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.066202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  16 in total

1.  Conditional Self-Entropy and Conditional Joint Transfer Entropy in Heart Period Variability during Graded Postural Challenge.

Authors:  Alberto Porta; Luca Faes; Giandomenico Nollo; Vlasta Bari; Andrea Marchi; Beatrice De Maria; Anielle C M Takahashi; Aparecida M Catai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Forecasting seizure risk in adults with focal epilepsy: a development and validation study.

Authors:  Timothée Proix; Wilson Truccolo; Marc G Leguia; Thomas K Tcheng; David King-Stephens; Vikram R Rao; Maxime O Baud
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of the interdependence between central and autonomic nervous systems in neonates during sleep.

Authors:  E Pereda; J J González
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Disentangling cardiovascular control mechanisms during head-down tilt via joint transfer entropy and self-entropy decompositions.

Authors:  Alberto Porta; Luca Faes; Andrea Marchi; Vlasta Bari; Beatrice De Maria; Stefano Guzzetti; Riccardo Colombo; Ferdinando Raimondi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Identifying true cortical interactions in MEG using the nulling beamformer.

Authors:  Hua Brian Hui; Dimitrios Pantazis; Steven L Bressler; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity.

Authors:  Guiomar Niso; Ricardo Bruña; Ernesto Pereda; Ricardo Gutiérrez; Ricardo Bajo; Fernando Maestú; Francisco del-Pozo
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

7.  Increase trend of correlation and phase synchrony of microwire iEEG before macroseizure onset.

Authors:  Sanqing Hu; Jianfen Chi; Jianhai Zhang; Wanzeng Kong; Yu Cao; Bin He
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Symbolic time series analysis of fNIRS signals in brain development assessment.

Authors:  Zhenhu Liang; Yasuyo Minagawa; Ho-Ching Yang; Hao Tian; Lei Cheng; Takeshi Arimitsu; Takao Takahashi; Yunjie Tong
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Spatiotemporal wavelet resampling for functional neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Michael Breakspear; Michael J Brammer; Ed T Bullmore; Pritha Das; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Inferring functional neural connectivity with phase synchronization analysis: a review of methodology.

Authors:  Junfeng Sun; Zhijun Li; Shanbao Tong
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.