Literature DB >> 14753637

Diazepam or midazolam for external DC cardioversion (the DORM Study).

A R J Mitchell1, S Chalil, L Boodhoo, G Bordoli, N Patel, N Sulke.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of two intravenous sedatives for physician-led DC cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients attending for elective DC cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias were randomized to intravenous midazolam or diazepam. Sedation was administered using titration protocols. Procedure times, operator satisfaction scores and adverse events were documented. The patients immediate, 24- and 48-h recall and awareness of after-effects were obtained from questionnaires. Seventy-one patients received midazolam (mean 12.5 mg) and 70 patients received diazepam (mean 28.1 mg). There were 16 minor adverse events with midazolam (20% hypotension, 3% oxygen desaturation) and nine with diazepam (7% hypotension, 6% required additional analgesia), P = 0.14. There were no major adverse events. Sedation time was 5.0 +/- 3.4 min for midazolam and 6.5 +/- 3.4 min for diazepam (P = 0.0016). Patients awoke 77 +/- 46 min post-sedation with midazolam and 39 +/- 24 min with diazepam (P < 0.0001). There was no recall of the procedure at 48 h and no difference in awareness of after-effects between the two groups at 24 or 48 h, P = ns.
CONCLUSION: Physician-led cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias using intravenous sedation is effective and well tolerated. Sedation with diazepam was associated with fewer minor adverse events and a quicker recovery time than midazolam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14753637     DOI: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00077-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. How much anesthesia is necessary?].

Authors:  T Sellmann; M Winterhalter; U Herold; P Kienbaum
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Rhythm control and cardioversion.

Authors:  N Sulke; F Sayers; G Y H Lip
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Best evidence topic report. Procedural sedation for cardioversion.

Authors:  Jeremy Wood; Craig Ferguson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Anaesthetic and sedative agents used for electrical cardioversion.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Amanda Nicholson; Stephanie S Reed; Johnny J Kenth; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-22

5.  The safety and effectiveness of a nurse led cardioversion service under sedation.

Authors:  L Boodhoo; G Bordoli; A R Mitchell; G Lloyd; N Sulke; N Patel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Sedation in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Neal S Gerstein; Andrew Young; Peter M Schulman; Eric C Stecker; Peter M Jessel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Comment on "Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Entonox Gas Compared with Midazolam and Fentanyl in Synchronized Cardioversion".

Authors:  Henrique Horta Veloso
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-15

8.  The use of conscious sedation in elective external direct current cardioversion: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Ronstan Lobo; Thomas Kiernan
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-05-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.